• Artemis@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I haven’t been around Lemmy for a few weeks and today is my first time seeing anyone from the Hexbear instance. I like you people.

          • Iraglassceiling [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            47
            ·
            1 year ago

            Death is not the only negative outcome from Covid infection. When you consider the literature on Covid causing grey matter loss, prion disease, chronic vasculitis, cardiac disease, autoimmune disease, etc, you could argue death is actually one of the preferred outcomes.

            Immunity isn’t an on/off switch and the virus is mutating to escape immune detection. It seems like you do not have a solid grasp on the kinetics of vaccine and viral immunity, is there a question I can answer for you or would you like some resources that might help improve your comprehension?

          • Shortstack@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            28
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Bruh.

            The curse of successful mitigation is skeptics will then say afterwards that ‘X was no big deal, look how few people died’

            Don’t be one of those.

            • Piers@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I blame the combination of how over-hyped the (real) issue of Y2K was combined with how successfully we handled it (partly because everyone was so worked up about it) leading to the (common issue for IT professionals) take away of “well nothing went wrong, why did we put all that effort into trying to stop something going wrong?” for no small part of why people weren’t as willing to try to stop/minimise Covid as they otherwise might have been (of course it was always going to be a harder sell as Y2K mostly required from the general public that they don’t have a tantrum about organisations paying professionals to fix the problem directly whereas Covid required the general public to follow the advice of the professionals in taking action in their own lives.)

          • reversebananimals@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            We all knew you had already drawn your conclusion that this was “fearmongering” before seeing any facts.

            No one is going to logic you out of a position you didn’t use logic to get into in the first place.

      • EremesZorn@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not how any of the COVID vaccines were reported to work. No such thing as total immunity.
        The virus is deadly depending on what conditions are met (underlying risk factors, etc.). Not all of those conditions are obvious or well-studied, so it always seemed to me like a lottery who gets killed by the virus.
        Furthermore, I don’t believe the article is fearmongering. As I said in a separate comment, it’s more like “hey, there might be a bit of an outbreak in some places this flu season, so keep some N95s on hand just in case numbers go up.” I HIGHLY doubt we would see another shutdown.

      • FoxAndKitten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because immunity varies by disease.

        Chicken pox? Pretty much one and done. COVID? Falls off rapidly after 3 months, whether you catch it or get the vaccine

        Plus, every mutation is a dice roll on how much existing immunity will apply. It could be exactly the same as the last strain, or the old immunity might not help at all