• Bigoldmustard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        They can and do. You’re right in a way that ignores the context of the situation you are commenting upon.

        The context is:

        Valve can seem to do very little and win.

        Publicly owned companies are often pressured to “diversify” or “cut costs” to give dividends to shareholders.

        As a privately owned company valve is not beholden to shareholders or takeover risks.

        Imagine I said I don’t have to worry about car payments because my car is paid off and you said “some cars suck”. That’s how right you are.

        • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          It only ignores the context if you’re assuming I am saying Valve is one of those private businesses that sucks. Having shareholders doesn’t mean a company will suck, just as being private is no guarantee it won’t suck.

          Imagine if the comment I replied to said “the sky is always blue” and I pointed out that sunrises and sunsets can be orange, pink or purple and entirely black at night.

      • RoosterBoy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, but they aren’t legally required to suck to appease the shareholders like public businesses are.