• hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      That couldn’t be further from truth. And it should be asked more often.

      Is it ethical to punish people of victimless crimes?
      Is it ethical for same sex couples to get married?
      Is it ethical to make golfball cores from yeeted fetuses?

      Now the answers to these questions should be obvious (assuming you’re not an asshole on my proprietary metric), but the question still has to be asked before a change to better can be made

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Betteridge’s law (what you are referencing without knowing the name of) is mostly just a symptom of the increasing “anti-intellectual”/“anti-journalism” push by the various totalitarian regimes of the world.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines

          In academia (which this is a lot closer to) it is wrong. And even among “pop journalism” it is really 50/50.

          But people, like you, cite it as an excuse to not actually engage with the topic at hand while feeling a sense of moral and intellectual superiority.

        • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Well we have clearly an example here that is definitely not a straightforward no answer, so your meme is misplaced

        • Corroded
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          No need to sound pretentious. Even now your comment isn’t super clear.

          almost every news headline that ask questions

          Do you mean ethical questions or general questions?

          almost always should result in a NO answer

          Do you mean writers set up a question and it typically ends with them disagreeing?

            • Corroded
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              My comment about you sounding pretentious was in regards to

              It’s a well known concept

              I was asking you to clarify what you were talking about and you immediately came off as demeaning and full of yourself.

              I don’t know if your explanation relates to ethics and the news, consent, or clickbait. Without knowing what you are talking about I couldn’t even argue with you if I wanted to.

                • Corroded
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Instead of accusing people of being pretentious, you could instead just ask what they meant. You might get a better response as people aren’t obligated to respond in kindness to insults.

                  My original comment was asking “What do you mean?”. I asked someone else what you could have meant and they explained it as “It means if you have to ask whether something is ethically okay than there’s a strong chance it isn’t”. You could have just explained the expression.

                  Your comments in this thread like

                  The point I made which you missed, is….

                  didn’t really help my opinion of your tone. People are just trying to discuss the topic.

                  Either way I think my thoughts are inline with @[email protected] when it comes to that and it was in a parallel thread with you so I won’t bother rehashing it.