It seems like the benefits are having the device lock/wipe itself after a set amount of attempts in case of a brute force attack and not having to run software to decrypt the drive on the device you plug it into.

I included a picture of the IronKey Keypad 200 but that’s just because it’s the first result that came up when I was looking for an example. There seem to be a few other manufacturers and models out there and they probably have different features.

I am curious what do you think of them? Do you think they are useful? Do you find it more a novelty?


It was an ExplainingComputers video titled Very Useful Small Computing Things that made me think of them.

  • Pantherina@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    No its not I think, at least Androids restricted af model doesnt allow that.

    Same with veracrypt

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I view portability to be the main benefit of a hardware solution. I agree that software options will allow for better security, but imo a less secure hardware option is better than nothing if portability is a requirement.