https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/2135509

this is practically a child’s view of the world. good guy vs bad guy. Russia = bad, NATO = good. plus, someone should tell her she has it completely backwards: ending russia is kinda natos entire thing

      • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.netEnglish
        43·
        1 year ago

        You have a backward view of history, without NATO there wouldn’t have been a fascist coup in Ukraine in 2014, which wouldn’t have led to a vicious civil war between Ukrainian Russian speakers and nazi banderites, which then wouldn’t have led to a Russian invasion

        Also ignores the fact Putin and Yeltsin wanted to join NATO, open a fuckin history book this shit ain’t that complex

      • ZoomeristLeninist [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.netOPEnglish
        23·
        1 year ago

        ur drawing way too many conclusions out of thin air. certainly they would bomb military supply lines, and those are valid military targets. but “bombing Poland” has a much more radical connotation. Russia has no reason to “bomb Poland”

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
        17·
        1 year ago

        You are just guessing. If Poland wasn’t already directly involved, attacking them would probably be a bad move compared to just cutting off the weapon supply with targeted attacks in western Ukraine.