I might have misunderstood this but is Android really trying to push this as tracking as a privacy upgrade, simply because it let’s us choose which of our interests we want advertisers to have access to?

  • neatchee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Yeah, so, Google already has this data about you. What they’re doing here is trying to reduce the specificity of information given to advertisers about your behaviors, and simultaneously give you the ability to never inform specific third parties about your interest in the specific topics you choose

    I see this as a good thing. They were literally already getting and using all of this data. In that case I’d much rather have some control over who knows which things about me, rather than leaving it entirely up to Google

    • peg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      97
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s not a good thing. It’s performative and designed to trick people into thinking that Google cares about their privacy and overlook the fact that Google are using their browser/search monopoly to extend their control over the advertising industry.

      • neatchee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        IMO Google is like Joe Biden. Not good, but infinitely better than the shit show that is the alternative (in the context of advertisers specifically)

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes google has this information - because we logged in and gave it to them - now they need our permission to wall it off from other businesses, thus creating THE revenue stream of the internet.

      So, if you’ll just click this little button here.

      This little one. Right there.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      It also helps Google form more of a monopoly on your info, since it keeps companies like Facebook from forming as accurate of a profile on you.

      • neatchee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s weird that we’ve arrived at “Don’t let Google have a monopoly on personally identifying you for advertising purposes!”

        • LWD@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s something they wanted all along, but it’s quite the PR stunt to further monopolize their control of the internet by removing all third party cookies, killing competition in the process, in order to implement their own custom solution in Chrome and Android (netting them the biggest browser share and mobile device share respectively). All while calling it private, too.

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s a good thing for Google. Who now controls all the data.

      It’s good for consumers, if you trust Google and enjoy them having an effective Monopoly on ads

    • ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      For the non tech person choosing to be as private as possible, can you just turn it off and it not collect anything? Sorry for the naive question. I honestly do not know the answer.

      • admiralteal@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Arguably more stuff is going to be collected and sent to more people if it’s turned off. But it will be in a more piecemeal though likely more personally identifiable way. At least that’s what Google would definitely argue

        I genuinely don’t know if the counterfactual is worse than the actual here. Either way bad.

  • IDew@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I might have misunderstood this but Android really trying to push this as tracking as a privacy upgrade

    Android Google

    This may also be known as privacy washing, but as another comment said, this way might be better than just not getting this choice at all

      • IDew@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        True, but we don’t get to choose a whole lot when it comes to Google. I personally don’t have Google Services on my phone and would like to keep it that way - so I’m not up to date what Google is pulling off these days :)

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Privacy.”

    They keep using this word. I do not think it means what they think it means.

  • De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well… I don’t use any apps that show ads. I’d rather not use my phone at all. And if Android adds more tracking itself it may be time to give Graphene a shot.

  • voxel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    well it’s an improvement…
    basically the tracking is still there but runs locally on your phone, so google only knows this

    someone with ip 1.2.3.4 is interested in sports, cats and videogames and is looking to purchase a new monitor

    (and the info is sent with every ad request, statelessly) google promises they won’t associate these requests with ip addresses, but I won’t trust them.

    instead of a full log like:

    user x with tracking id 12345 visited catworld.com at 10:34:56 PM and stayed there for 35 seconds
    user x with tracking id 12345 made a purchase on website shoptech.com and was scrolling through the monitors page for 10 minutes.

    it’s still tracking but it sucks less i guess…
    and making it a default is probably a great move

    (I’d rather opt out of any form of tracking tho)

    • heisenbug4242@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      And since only Google knows it strengthens their data monopoly even further, as if it wasn’t bad enough already.

      • MiDaBa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m split on this concept. Assuming we can’t get away from tracking I would prefer a company like Google over a company like Meta. Google doesn’t sell your data, they just serve ads based on what data they have. Meta and other data brokers will sell your data to whoever ponies up the cash. I’m not happy about being tracked either way. I just recognize one system is considerably worse than the other. Also, if (and this is a big if) Google honors your request to delete your data then I believe it would be even less of a concern. Right now I have my Google data set to auto delete after three months. Ideally that would be enough data to help with traffic suggestions etc while serving up relevant ads but not enough to build an invasive profile. Realisticly we need more laws outlining how our data can be used and ensuring that it’s not retained in ANY form after a set period of time or when it’s deletion is requested.

        • delirious_owl@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Obviously by “google” were talking about proprietary blobs.

          For example TOTP is great. There’s no issue with the fact that it was developed by Google. Same with AOSP.

          Any ROM doesn’t have Google Play Services by default and therefore its google free in all the ways that matter

          • Pantherina@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            No some OS preinstall microG. Because only if the core is finished you can hash and sign it, if the user flashes some apps afterwards that doesnt work.

            Btw ROM is read only memory, a tiny part of the firmware

            • Fisch@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              MicroG is open source tho and only talks to Google if you explicitely activate it

              • Pantherina@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                No its not. They download Google Binaries which run as system apps and have privileged access.

                They practice badness enumeration in some form, while their permission model (only activating what is needed) is a better approach but incomplete.

                Any app that relies on Play has those libraries implemented, so they could show ads etc. on their own. But with microG they have a component with privileged system access, in contrast to sandboxed play where no component is privileged.

          • Pantherina@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Which is even less degoogles as it preinstalls microG which is official Google binaries, running as a system app with permission to critical system infos and basically all your stuff.

            See my other comments.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I wish but switching to Apple would be just as bad and I would want to die being forced to use their fisher price software for the tech illiterate.

      Soon though, in the next 5 years I think Linux phones (I know Android is Linux, you know what I mean) will be in a good state. So hopefully I can switch soonish

      • michael_palmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Google and SOC vendors are trying their best to stop developing of Linux phones. That’s why available Linux phones use 10 year old chipsets.

        • Bloodyhog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Lets be frank, the main reason is that only like 1% of the market has an articulated preference towards free software and privacy. No money to be made equals no product in our cruel world. And of course FOSS, even if it is free to a user (as in you do not have to pay to use it. You do need to spend your time and resources to learn it though, and that is not free already), is by no means free to develop. The time spent on it by devs has to be compensated somehow, enthusiasm is unfortunately not the only fuel our bodies need. And then, for phones, the hardware required is not free as well. And then we need a manufacturer, who would be much more interested in making a billion Android phones than a million of a niche product.

          Does Google actively try to stop development of the alternatives? Unlikely, because they don’t have to. They do not make it easier of course, why would they. And they do buy out everything they can, because they can use it to improve their products.

          I do not see a good way out of this loop for now. Do you?

      • The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I am waiting for the same thing. The amount of shit you have to disable, block, or unistall on android is getting ridiculous. It’s getting really old.

        Most of the new “features” that either apple or google add anymore are absolute trash. I am constantly having to go through the settings and disable shit.

        The stock android is so full of non-romovable crap that a launcher is required anymore.

        It’s the same for windows, win11 is only usable with a launcher like startallback.

        • Pantherina@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Dont wait, just get a Pixel 6a-8 and install GrapheneOS.

          (8 is expensive but will last 7+ years with extended GrapheneOS updates)

          • ridethisbike@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            What do you use in place of GApps? F-droid?

            Also, what’s the flashing process like these days? Does it still wipe everything or is there a way to save all the personal stuff?

            • Pantherina@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Just check grapheneos.org

              They have only a minimal appstore preinstalled, which they use for their own apps. It is the best there is with full background updates etc. Every store could do this if they used modern libraries.

              You have Vanadium preinstalled, from which you can install “F-Droid Basic” (the modern client), or Aurorastore, or accrescent, obtainium etc.

              Their own solution is sandboxed google play, installed as regular user apps with way more restricted permissions and an opt-in method (only dedicated calls are allowed) in contrast to the extremely privileged microG or even “GAPPS” which can do everything (and in the place of microG having selected things removed, badness enumeration while still using proprietary Google code).

              GrapheneOS is basically Android done right, play services etc. work, you can install all Google apps from the playstore, not as system apps, if you wanted to. (wallet and others are exceptions as they require a Google certified OS).

        • Pantherina@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Calyx is way worse than Graphene. Only use it if your device is not supported by GrapheneOS > DivestOS.

          And afaik Calyx doesnt even support many phones lol. On GrapheneOS this is actually due to missing security, which Calyx doesnt even use.

      • delirious_owl@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I dont think they’re saying to use Apple. I read that as “Use Android without Google” … Which is actually easier than using Android with Google if you install the OS yourself.

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Fuck banking institutions & their apps. We are seeing them eliminate online banking now & cash is slowly not being accepted by vendors & in-person experiences are worse—instead everything is siloed to only Android or iOS & disallow any sort of modifications to your device with all these attestation assertions. If a user wanted to ditch their phone, go Linux, use an unGoogled phone, or get a dumbphone, etc. they will be disconnected from the banking network—to which most users would view as an immediate nonstarter. Apple is just a different data-collecting advertising business.

      • boomzilla@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The browser login of my bank needs a separate application that’s windows only or an app. The Java(!) application Jameica saved my ass for the 6 years I’m on Linux now. It can manage multiple accounts. It offers statistics, saves all the transfers, deposits and balances ad infinitum on your disk, is searchable and has templates and schedules for transfers.

        The protocol my bank uses is FinTS, I think. I’m logging in via a certificate file and a password.

        I don’t want to use an app, cause I trust my cutting edge Linux (Kernel 6.7.6) a lot more than my possibly malicious app riddled outdated android.

      • delirious_owl@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        In many places its illegal to not accept cash. Report any businesses and if its legal in your area, donate to your local privacy lobbiest NGO and contact your representative.

        • kungen@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          In many places its illegal to not accept cash.

          Where? I can’t think of many places where that’d be true.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Apple is terrible right to repair, and lineage has a bunch of weird bugs, so I’m kinda stuck with it

      • N4CHEM@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Which bugs have you found in LineageOS? There’s quite a big community behind it, so maybe you can find some help. There are also other LineageOS-based ROMs worth checking: CalyxOS, DivestOS, iodéOS, /e/OS.

      • Pantherina@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        GrapheneOS is the only good Option. Calyx and /e/ are both just LineageOS forks with incomplete or even insecure additions

      • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        DeGoogle your Android ROM/use a custom ROM. What exactly was so hard to understand in that comment that made you want to switch to a feature-phone?

          • Pantherina@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Thats how you do it with GrapheneOS. Buy a pixel, take like 30min to install the OS, install F-Droid Basic and sandboxed Play and get your apps.

            Degoogling Android is not possible, and LineageOS and other more difficult to install Androids are less secure.

            GrapheneOS has a graphical installer, you just need a Laptop (Windows, Linux, Mac), a Chromebook or another Android phone and a USB cable, thats it. You can literally install it from one phone (using some variant of Chromium like Chrome, Cromite, Brave etc.) By opening a website and clicking 4 buttons.

          • mxl@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            You mean the one who stepped down like half a year ago? Also GOS is not the work of a single person, you know…

              • mxl@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                You’re right he’s still committing, however it’s easily verifiable he’s not the only one. Still I’ll give you that, since it seems Micay is quite active. I guess I am a “sheep that blindly trusts”, since I don’t have the skills to audit the code in this case. I will assume you are not such a sheep (otherwise why would you accuse someone else of being so?), so would you please enlighten me on the verifications you’ve done or the evidence you’ve found that makes you not trust the GOS project? On top of that. What do you trust for a mobile OS?

      • OrangeCorvus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        ios is not really privacy friendly. It’s more the result of an amazing PR campaign. That plus the fact that Apple wasn’t really in the ad game but now it is slowly changing. In reality you are giving your data to Apple. You will say, yeah but Apple is ok, of course they are because they have great marketing. Google doesn’t and Google = privacy nightmare, which is also true.

        • Pantherina@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          IOS being private is such a horrible lie. Techlore is really annoying with those subtle ads, even though they also often cover GrapheneOS.

          If Apple wants your shit, with any of their OS you are theirs. You are not private if you need to rely on the mercy of Big Brother to not steal your stuff

      • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Its funny that I was forced to buy a google pixel just to avoid google. Wish more companies here allow people to unlock bootloader on the mobile they own.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Smartphones are Spyware and Data harvest devices by definition, all of them. I get goosebumps every time when I see people using their cell phones to payfor banking, discount apps from supermarkets, saving sensitive data in these gadgets. Almost all cases of large data leaks of sensitive data in the past are due to this, the unconscious use of these devices. They are surveillance devices of large companies for commercial purposes.

    That they now offer you as privacy feature to choose who they are going to sell your data to, is more than ironic, they piss on your face and say that it is raining and people believe it.

  • devilish666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    Although you can turn off the ads they can still track & harvest your data in all directions because it’s google

  • wrekone@lemmyf.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    I do my best to set things up so that I don’t see any ads (running DNS66 for example). But if I had to see ads, I’d prefer them to be irrelevant. That way they’re easier to ignore. I don’t need to do any favors for the corporate giants trying to milk me for every penny.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Google offering privacy by profiling and sharing app usage info

    There, I fixed it for you