• Egon [they/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh yeah for sure. I’m not really up on my star wars lore. As far as I understand it the joke sort of started because Anakin and his mother is a slave in I, but there’s no “slaves” in the original trilogy, which then makes people wonder how that is, which leads to a humorous observation.

      The text is pretty clear that the empire is worse than the republic, but that’s the joke I guess
      “Sure the text says the empire is worse, but the republic had slaves haha funny observation”.
      Then people sort of started running with it and you end up with unironic empire stans.

      Like it’s just a silly joke noticing one discrepancy (slaves Vs no slaves) without focusing on the bigger picture (brutal political repression, genocide of minorities, apartheid regime, religious repression, etc.).
      I don’t think it was meant as something that could stand up to scrutiny, which is also why it’s so strange it led to actual empire stans.
      It’s also what makes it more ironic to me because the empire stans go “well the empire was better than the republic” (never mind wether it was or not) and completely ignore the rebellion posing a viable alternative