Just commit, no matter the response. Adding /s is akin to explaining a joke after you tell it. If someone doesn’t understand or pick up on the sarcasm, it’s not your responsibility to spell it out for them. You add /s because you don’t want to be held accountable.

  • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The /s tone indicator on the internet is a relatively recent development. We got by many years without using them.

    • 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The /s tone indicator on the internet is a relatively recent development. We got by many years without using them.

      And how did we do that? With other indicators. /s is just a more specific evolution of ;). But winky face is used for more than just sarcasm, so confusion develops. Thus, we have /s

    • DreamerofDays@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is a fundamentally dseems like an argument than in your post, and more or less is just an argument against any sort of progress or innovation. “We got by without ____ for many years, so what benefit could they offer us?”

      If communication is intended, then the speaker or writer has a responsibility to make an effort toward being accurately understood. That effort involves using forms, formats, and punctuation that is old and well established, as well as more novel elements of them.

    • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      “I don’t like this new thing everyone has been doing for years now, nothing should ever change”

                 - wesker
      

      Go sit in your geocities page and murmur your ICQ handle over and over to yourself. Tone indicators have been a nice addition to online discussion.