• seriousconsideration@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Incorrect. He was assassinated because he blew the whistle on management cutting corners with QA. Nothing to do with DEI hiring practices. I think you dropped this white hood…

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Ah yes, that certainly is completely unrelated to management also trying to meet their DEI goals at the same time. Pure coincidence these two things happened at the same time.

      • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        A million things were happening at the same time in a company of that size and complexity. So yeah until you can prove a connection (which you haven’t even attempted to do) the rational conclusion is coincidence. You’re a rational person, right?

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          I obviously cannot prove a direct connection, that would require actual evidence like a work log or a video of the person doing it. Since I neither work there nor with the police I am clearly not in any position to obtain such evidence. If you’re expecting such things from a forum discussion, you’re at the wrong address. You’re looking for the court room.

          But absence of proof isn’t proof of absence either, so your insistence that these things have nothing to do with each other is just as unproven as my conjecture.

          • dezvous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            Translation: “I can’t prove anything so I’m gonna blame minorities for problems until someone provides real evidence (evidence which I will ignore and continue blaming minorities)”

              • yuriy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                You’re being bashed for claiming something entirely unbelievable to anyone who isn’t EXTREMELY racially biased. A literal man made of straw would add more meaning to the discourse than you have.

                Please keep making a fool of yourself, it’s turning into a valuable PSA about racism.

          • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            There are an infinite number of theories that cannot be proven or disproven. In the absence of any causal evidence your assertion remains irrational. For example I can’t prove you’re not a pedophile. You cant provide me with evidence that disproves you being a pedophile. Yet if I were to make a random assumption that you’re a pedophile remains, that would be irrational.

            But absence of proof isn’t proof of absence either, so your insistence that these things have nothing to do with each other is just as unproven as my conjecture.

            I made no such insistence. I am pointing out that there is no reason to believe those things are connected. There are and infinite uinebr of potentially connected things. Believing in any of them without evidence is irrational. Since you’re unable to even begin to provide any causal link, you are being irrational.