• aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I know, that’s not what I said though. I said the Romans did discriminate, against bottoms.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah but it was more of a condition than a social wedge issue. Hierarchal toxic masculinity shit, not so much class persecution, and didn’t in a lot of cases (I might be remembering a Greek thing, so easy to mix them up when roman culture is mostly a shitty port of Greek culture) topping/bottoming get based on age? Or did that not carry over?

                • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  As in I’m saying ancient Greeks discriminated saw the act as demeaning/lesser, but did not, I don’t think, see it as an identity, abd what role one performed was based on status/age/whatever.

                  One was not a bottom (though perhaps was x’s bottom), but did bottoming.

                  • aidan@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Iirc, at least the Romans wrote rhymes insulting people who were especially career bottoms, but yeah I don’t know what they did as they got older.