I hope this isn’t out of context, also I don’t want to “own the libs” or something here, I’m actually interested.

  • grayman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    In no particular order…

    1. Many men are total pussies and would never consider self defense to the point of killing someone something they would do.
    2. Somewhat contradictally, people don’t trust themselves with a gun, so therefore, they don’t trust others with guns.
    3. Feminism. Feminism raises mothering to a societal level. Women want everyone to be protected and safe via the a motherly govt overlord. Women intrinsically desire equal outcome. That requires communism. So any means to achieve that. Like authoritarianism.
    4. The rise of Marxism and authoritarianism. Many people want to be told what to do. That only works on a broad scale if the people who refuse are unarmed.
    5. Ignorance. Cognitive dissonance. Narcissism. Lack of critical thinking skills. Inability to set feelings aside and consider things logically.
    6. Brainwashing. There’s about 3 generations that have grown up with commie public schools telling them guns are bad. I’ve converted quite a few democrats from gun fear to fun by just taking them shooting and covering the $40 worth of ammo they use up.
    • OK. There’s no way you’re not a troll, but (2), I take issue with. I own guns and am pro gun control, and (2) is bullshit because I’m the only person I trust with one. The rest of you crayon-eating assholes, I wouldn’t trust with scissors.

      I also take issue with (5), because it’s only dumb bastards who are unable to understand basic math enough to notice that, globally, murder rates are highly correlated with firearm (and especially, handgun) ownership.

      (6) assumes that a reasoned position is a result of fear, which is because that’s how you react to the world, and so believe this is true for everyone. It’s ok; it’s a common failing of the human character, but you’re in luck, because it’s easy to mature out of.

      I own guns, but if we get reasonable gun control laws in this country, I’ll be OK with it because all y’all obviously don’t know your ass from your elbow and keep shooting each other. I’ll be ok also because I haven’t made guns my identity, and I have other hobbies.

      You gave the troll away when you threw feminism in there. That was too over-the-top baiting, and it came out of nowhere. However, the dig at Marxism was pretty well played, given how many far-left there are on Lemmy. That was chef’s kiss.

      • grayman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        You exemplify #5 and are apparently a boot licker since you support gun control. Probably red flag laws too! Disgusting!

        If you understood this basic math you speak of, you’d know that literally no govt ever lays down arms next to it’s citizens. Gun control is control of the populace. Nothing less. How can you say with a straight face that you support only the govt having firearms when the last 100 years have shown humanity what happens when govt has too much power. Every country that has taken away firearms has had not a decrease in violence but am increase! Are you aware that home invasions are higher after confiscation? Other violence too, but let’s just consider the horror of having armed invaders in your castle, raping and hurting your family.

        I am no troll. I am an absolutist. As recently ruled, illegal immigrants have the same inalienable rights as a citizen to the entirety of the bill of rights. The felon that has served his time and deemed safe to release into society absolutely gains all his rights upon release.

        You claim we - who is we? The liberal (in the true sense of the word) gun owner? - keep killing each other. Who is killing whom? The gangs and the criminals. So you DEMAND that the innocent be disarmed? How stupid! How can you claim logic and reason yet make such a statement! Only a fool argues that sheep remove their teeth when the wolf bites!

        And feminism is anti liberal (again, the true sense of the word). Feminism is the worship and the belief of superiority of one sex over another. How bigoted and ignorant. Feminism destroys the family unit, peaceful society, and is antithetical to biological predispositions that allow man and woman live in peace and happiness with one another. I can already see your pathetic response that women deserve equal rights to men. Please tell me this: What right does a man have today that a woman does not?

        If I am a troll, it is because I mistook this sub for one where gun rights are respected. I see that some believe this is the place to complain about guns, not support them. How sad and pathetic.

        I wish you no harm. Only that you are cleansed of this brainwashed set of ideals that do nothing to support the ideal that all men (and women - as I’m sure you don’t understand English grammar enough to know that means both sexes) are allowed to defend themselves any way necessary to preserve their life and liberty.

        • It’s a sub for people who are interested in guns, whether they own them or not. What it isn’t is a crack-job 2A extremist circle-jerk. Plenty of folks here support the 2nd amendment. Some, like me, think it’s an anachronism from a time when a civilian uprising had a snowball’s chance in hell against our modern military. Hell, you don’t have a chance against our paramilitarized police force, much less any branch of our armed forces. But, still, the amendment is there, and we have to work with that, and the consequences of “militias” trying to kidnap or assasinate elected officials. Which I’m sure is what the founding fathers intended when they added that amendment 🙄

      • bi_tux@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I could debate this with you, but you don’t even understand the mastermind above, because you’re an evil freedom hating commie

  • BaldProphet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Honestly, I think it’s mostly fear. There are practical reasons to own a gun and be familiar with its use and maintenance, but there are people who have varying levels of fear of weapons on a spectrum from simple discomfort to full on hoplophobia. The same people seem to be generally uncomfortable with being responsible for their own safety, and prefer to live in areas where government agencies are at hand to deal with any kinds of emergencies they may have.

    It’s the “don’t do this, get an adult” mentality extending into adulthood. Once you’re an adult, the next level of authority to shunt personal responsibility onto is the government.

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Honestly, I think it’s mostly fear.

      Rightly so, because you could get shot just for coming across some idiot who’s having a bad day.

      There are no “practical” uses for a gun that come up often enough in people’s lives to outnumber the needless death from misuse, or purposeful murder.

      Since 2007, there have been less than 500 justifiable homicides per year in the US. And that includes all means of defense. So it’s a myth that gun owners are somehow more responsible for their own safety. People just aren’t using guns for self defense. You know what they are using them for? Murder.

      So the people who defend gun ownership are the ones shunting personal responsibility to protect themselves and their communities.

      https://www.statista.com/statistics/251894/number-of-justifiable-homicides-in-the-us/

      • Jackie's Fridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Along the lines of “fear” I would also add that ubiquitous gun ownership is a large reason for the militarisation and overzealous violence in American police departments. Since anybody could be bristling with guns, the police approach many situations armed for the worst. This makes nobody safer.

        • BaldProphet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Anybody could be bristling with guns since long before the militarization of police in America.

      • BaldProphet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nah, man. The police have no obligation to protect me, and even if they did, they can’t get to me fast enough.

        Private weapon ownership (of guns or any other weapons) is inseparable from the human right of self-defense.