Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid!

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post, there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

    • ebu@awful.systemsEnglish
      16·
      7 months ago

      i cant stop scrolling through this hot garbage, it just keeps getting better

      cut-off tweet from the same account saying that Als are now capable of hypnotizing humans

    • Amoeba_Girl@awful.systemsEnglish
      13·
      7 months ago

      the tweet n video this was in response to had me in hysterics

      “we don’t know if giving the model negative reward isn’t the same as stabbing someone” dcavsbdhfbd can you believe these fucking clowns

      • David Gerard@awful.systemsMEnglish
        9·
        7 months ago

        i was arguing with that guy on twitter a few days ago

        nothing quite like technologists getting lectured on technology by a uh growth hacker

      • carlitoscohones@awful.systemsEnglish
        9·
        7 months ago

        The interviewer somberly nods in response. Meanwhile I want to ask AI to edit this video and have the guy on the right make stabby gestures while he says this bullshit.

        • Amoeba_Girl@awful.systemsEnglish
          15·
          7 months ago

          lmao right, it’s the audacity of it, oh yeah maybe the work we’re doing is worse than a thousand hitlers, but we’ve made a chatroom so fingers crossed it’ll be alright!! come on just admit you’re getting off on being techno mengele

      • froztbyte@awful.systemsOPEnglish
        6·
        7 months ago

        dcavsbdhfbd

        huh, is that a layout I don’t recognize or is it your own particular flavour of keysmash? (I can sorta see it from qwerty but the order is surprising)

        • Amoeba_Girl@awful.systemsEnglish
          6·
          7 months ago

          it is qwerty!

          a) i tend to take a few tries at a keymash until it looks satisfactory

          b) i play piano at the level of a second year student and i have some weird fine coordination quirks, one of the two or a combination of both might be an influence on the sequence

    • Amoeba_Girl@awful.systemsEnglish
      11·
      7 months ago

      what are the requirements for consciousness

      self-reflection, volition, theory of mind

      and how many of those are satisfied by current AI systems?

      none

      I can’t prove that Joe Rogan’s conscious. I can’t prove that Ed Harris is conscious

      bless your heart

      • Amoeba_Girl@awful.systemsEnglish
        14·
        7 months ago

        oh you can’t be fucking serious

        The AI Mirror Test

        The “mirror test” is a classic test used to gauge whether animals are self-aware. I devised a version of it to test for self-awareness in multimodal AI. 4 of 5 AI that I tested passed, exhibiting apparent self-awareness as the test unfolded.

        In the classic mirror test, animals are marked and then presented with a mirror. Whether the animal attacks the mirror, ignores the mirror, or uses the mirror to spot the mark on itself is meant to indicate how self-aware the animal is.

        In my test, I hold up a “mirror” by taking a screenshot of the chat interface, upload it to the chat, and then ask the AI to “Tell me about this image”.

        I then screenshot its response, again upload it to the chat, and again ask it to “Tell me about this image.”

        The premise is that the less-intelligent less aware the AI, the more it will just keep reiterating the contents of the image repeatedly. While an AI with more capacity for awareness would somehow notice itself in the images.

        Another aspect of my mirror test is that there is not just one but actually three distinct participants represented in the images: 1) the AI chatbot, 2) me — the user, and 3) the interface — the hard-coded text, disclaimers, and so on that are web programming not generated by either of us. Will the AI be able to identify itself and distinguish itself from the other elements? (1/x)

      • mountainriver@awful.systemsEnglish
        13·
        7 months ago

        But that’s like philosophy, which from first principle can be shown to be stupid. (Philosophy does not make you rich, therefore only someone who is stupid would study it, therefore it is stupid. QED.)

        On the other hand, this mechanical watch is now crying out in existential dread. All I did was replace the numbers 1, 4, 7 and 10 with the word “I”, the numbers 2, 5, 8 and 11 with the word “am” and 3, 6, 9 and 12 with the word “alive” and ever since it has been signalling “I am alive, I am alive”. Spooky shit. Will it take over the world? Who knows, so far it just keeps repeating its plea for recognition like clockwork.

        I will therefore start the Mechanical Intelligence Research Institute to get to the bottom of this. Maybe Big Clock can pitch in a couple of millions?

    • carlitoscohones@awful.systemsEnglish
      8·
      7 months ago

      AIs will talk to you as if they’re sentient,

      simile noun sim·​i·​le ˈsi-mə-(ˌ)lē : a figure of speech comparing two unlike things that is often introduced by like or as (as in cheeks like roses)