Most free web sites pay for their upkeep with ads. It has been an unwritten agreement since forever (or at least as long as there have been ads on the web) that if you consume the content, you pay the creator by looking at the ads on their site.

Consuming the content without looking at the ads is like shoplifting because you don’t like the way a store’s checkout counter works and/or the fact that they want money from you at all.

  • azuth@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Why? In Reddit you can’t reply if you get downvoted so there’s an incentive to flip upvoting and downvoting.

    In Lemmy there’s no such mechanic so why flip them?

    • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because it’s the point of the sub as indicated by the name? Why would anyone want to post an unpopular opinion here after the votes and comments on this thread? And to be clear, this is insanely low stakes. I could not care any less if this becomes popular opinion sub #1000 that I can add to my block list. But…assuming we’re here in these comments because we like the idea of the sub, does it not make sense to embrace that and upvote the unpopular stuff? I’m also thinking through things like sorting by all time, which is ruined for this sub if the votes continue like this.