• jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve answered your questions, it’s quite telling that you refuse to answer mine.

            • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I asked first, for a source, the one you provided was shit and I already explained why.

              Unless you have another, I must conclude your original statement was made without proper citation, and was therefore invalid and not even worth going further.

              I did provide another source, Hunter himself who, under oath, confirmed those emails are real. You really need to take a little time to read people’s replies and understand them. It’s ok if you need to reread everything some people need extra time to understand everything.

                • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  HAHAHAHA you still don’t get it.

                  None of what you provided, even Hunter’s transcripts, implicates Joe in anything. You have yet to directly address this, meaning there’s nothing for me to respond to.

                  Your back to this lie, I never claimed Joe was implicated by the emails. In my very first response I said there was no evidence that he was involved. I have no idea what mental defect you posses that causes you to be unable to understand this.

                  Once again, Hunter is not relevant to anything political or conservative in any way, so there’s no point in saying anymore on him.

                  If that’s true then why do you keep responding? Why were you so triggered by me saying hunters emails had more than drug and dick picks?