• jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean, yeah? You can be cynical and say it’s timed to distract but this does make him better on immigration

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      There really shouldn’t be a need for penalties in the first place. This is just more boring “I don’t actually want to fix immigration, but I need to look like I am, so instead I’m going to do this not-even-half-measure to get some good headlines” bullshit.

      Generally, spouses of citizens can apply to get a green card (and a k3 non-immigrant visa while that’s pending… but apparently that takes just as long… fuck our goverment.)

      Or maybe a K3 should just be granted when somebody applies for a green card to begin with. ask them to check in with somebody once a month until a background check clears or something, and once it does, the K3 is conditional on the green card. You know. Let them become “productive members of society” and that bull shit.

      And before somebody says ‘TeRrOrIsM!!!’ or something like that. these undocumented immigrants are already living here. Think about that. if they really were terrorists, do you think they’ll go to the immigration service and ask for citizenship, or a green card? and do you really think actual terrorists are going to bother with getting a k3/green card visa at all? Most are already citizens.

      • BearGun@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        On the other hand, “perfect is the enemy of progress”. While this certainly doesn’t solve the issue, it is an (admittedly minor) improvement.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s not even close to what’s necessary.

          I will say that the pbs article posted gives a better explanation- in that they are doing some of what I’m saying- it just waiving but actively ignoring penalties going forward- but that article is from undisclosed “sources” so I’ll have to wait to make final judgement.

          In any case, it’s not progress when you consider how he’s gone so far to the right on every other aspect of immigration.

          I’m not asking for perfect. I’m not even asking for good. I’m asking for sufficient, and on the whole, he ain’t.