• golli@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    To be fair: from a financial perspective that sounds like the right call, even if the movie would have been interesting.

    R rated horror movies just don’t bring in the amount of money to sustain high budgets like that. The exception being “It” (and the sequel), but that had more mainstream appeal and also only came out years later.

    Although isn’t the break even number usually closer to double the budget?

    • UKFilmNerd@feddit.ukM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      With regard to breaking even, I was just recalling what I found on a small article about the film. So who knows what it would really need to break even? Double sounds more realistic though.