• It’s also a case where the communist movement gained power well within the bounds of established electoral processes. And Cybersyn directly addressed many of the historical shortcomings of central planning. It’s almost a caricature of how ingenuine capitalist critiques of communist movements are. We get it right by their own claimed standards and they get brazenly couped by western capital anyway.

          • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            “Howling holes in the fabric of society through which millions of souls are dragged screaming into the void every annum” just doesnt have the same sleekness to it

        • EnsignRedshirt [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Cybersyn wasn’t an attempt at doing full central planning, it was a means of distributing decisionmaking and information gathering about the economy and using a computer system to aggregate and coordinate information across a distributed network. The actual work of figuring out how and what to produce was very much in the hands of humans. Having more computing power now just means better data and better predictions, but Cybersyn was never meant to be a robot central planner. A computer will never be able to do central planning, period. A computer can only help augment and coordinate human decisionmaking.

          Also, all economies are planned.