• StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    3 days ago

    This Biden protection is crazy. we need a candidate who actually stands a chance against Trump. this is insane. It’s 2016 all over again.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t even see why that matters. Even if the candidate was an actual real turnip, the choice would be obvious.

      I mean I don’t vote in your election but it seems quite clear to me.

      • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think part of our different view might be based on how our electoral system is.

        So to explain: Trump’s never won a popular election before. Even when he became president, most Americans voted for his opposition Hillary Clinton. We have a very gerrymandered and corrupt voting system to oversimplify. Because of that The main decider for presidential elections is voting turnout. If a lot of people come out to vote, the Democrats usually win. If they don’t the Republicans win. Voter turnout is higher when people want to vote for the Democratic nominee. No one really wants to vote for Biden. Most of us will vote against Trump myself included. That being said, if we run a very unlikable candidate against him like we did in 2016, he might win and that’s terrifying. This election is serious so we should take it seriously and run somebody likeable and not half way to being a turnip.

        God forbid if Biden stays in there, I hope he wins. I’ll even vote for him but I am not feeling good about his odds.

        • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I think you missed their point. They, and many others, don’t know why anyone would vote for Trump to begin with. Of course, I said the same thing when he first started being presented as a candidate for 2016. Like, of all people, him? But, here we are today, wondering if he actually had a chance for another term.

          A different voting method may have avoided him getting this far, but he really shouldn’t have even gotten out of the joke candidate category to begin with.

          • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 days ago

            My bad Thanks for letting me know.

            I totally get that sentiment. I don’t really understand it either. I have family members that votes for Trump. It’s like their brain is rotted. They constantly use words that they don’t have a definition for like woke or CRT. They think everyone is lying except for Trump. It’s terrifying honestly.

            I think that’s about 30% to 40% of Americans sadly.

            • medgremlin@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              3 days ago

              In my experience, the people who vote Republican/conservative/Trump do so out of a certain amount of philosophical and emotional laziness and denial. Confronting the roots of our societal problems is difficult and uncomfortable, and takes a degree of empathy and emotional intelligence that many people simply do not have. To be clear; it is rarely their fault and frequently a result of the external influences and education during their formative years.

              The conservative viewpoint that has functionally become hereditary and contagious is that you are special and good, and the only people that are also special and good must have the same values, prejudices, advantages, and deficiencies that you do. This is why if you are nice and polite to conservatives they start spouting more and more bigoted bullshit. It’s because, in their mind, the only good people are the ones that agree with them, and they perceive you as “good” for extending basic decency to them.

              This cognitive shortcut is how I have succeeded in planting a lot of seeds of progressive values in the minds of my classmates at the conservative, religious school I accidentally ended up in. Each one of them is a single starfish, so to speak, but each individual moves the needle a little bit. Small progress is better than no progress.

              • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                This is why if you are nice and polite to conservatives they start spouting more and more bigoted bullshit

                I always interpret this as projecting their opinions. If you give the person nothing to suggest a specific political leaning and have a positive enough interaction it’s too easy for them to assume you hold the same values as you.

                I’ve honestly caught myself in the same, so I just try to stay apolitical in interactions at work until others reveal their opinions to me

              • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                3 days ago

                I also attended a small private religious conservative school growing up. Happy to see someone like me out in the world with progressive politics. Good on you stranger. ☺️ I hope you’re living life to the fullest.

                That explanation makes sense to me. Good theory 👈😎

                • SOB_Van_Owen@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  I compare my time in a similar situation to being exposed to some nasty disease. It was misery at the time but has provided some inoculation against authoritarianism and demagoguery since. Also let me know sadists are a thing.

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            Addendum point: The people we need to convince to win are not the people who see the obvious distinction between Joe and Trump, and if you haven’t convinced them yet, you probably aren’t going to – especially not after that debate performance (which is why they took the gamble to do that debate in the first place).

          • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            And before that, it was DEI for the pro-slavery States. Back before black people and even women could vote, whites didn’t have numbers enough to win many elections, so they created the Electoral College and made it so that black people counted as 3/5ths of a “person” and slave owners could vote in the names of their slaves.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, this is where I’m at. I’m not an American, but I will feel the impact of your country’s decisions very quickly. I think the best option is to beg the non-voters to get out and vote however you can while building a new party, or rebuilding an existing one, from the local level on up until you have a realistic chance of putting a leader worth having in place.

          For what it’s worth, I think the Biden administration hasn’t done terribly. They could have done much better with the latest episode of the Israel-Gaza conflict, but we literally had Congress people advocating for a nuclear response. A lot of improvements in other areas were quietly made in the background that wasn’t really talked about. I can’t say if that’s because Biden picked the right people to get things done, he had the right vision, or he just had good handlers. I’m not sure I care because, whatever the answer is, the opponent certainly doesn’t have any of those.

      • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Because he has to be effective for four more years after the vote.

        Fuck its like you people think everything just closes up for the next four years and elections are just a one-day championship ceremony

        • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          After the ceremony, you plant the turnip in a flower pot and have the administration run things. There’s hundreds of other people, from ministers (or secretaries, over there) to all kinds of aides and attachés and whatnot. Just one guy missing wouldn’t really make much difference.

    • Desistance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I’m not voting for the insurrectionist in 2024. I don’t care how frail Biden looks. The choice is obvious. I’ll worry about the next candidate.

      • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        No one Is suggesting you should vote for Trump and his fascist. I’m saying I’m worried Biden won’t beat Trump and his fascist in an election because he’s not a strong candidate at all. This is the same problem we have with Hillary in 2016

        • Bibliotectress@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          You’re not wrong, but he’s the incumbent. They were never going to switch him out. He beat Trump last time, and there’s no way the DNC was ever going to float someone different. Hillary was not the incumbent.

          But man it would be awesome to have “Yes we can” slogan energy back again. The speeches on the runup to Obama’s first presidential election were so morale-boosting. I ended up canvassing for him when I lived in northwest Indiana with my baby in a stroller and my toddler walking around with us. It was awesome.

          Now I mostly just vote and get really upset a lot.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        The reality is that with the Republicans embracing fascism America will not recover without the candidacy of another FDR, someone who voters can not only want to vote for but will replace any overly partisan Congresscritter that opposes his agenda.

        That’s not happening. Period. Maybe the Democrats will win this year, maybe not, but in 2026 and 2028 they’ll still be ratcheting America to fascism regardless with their neverending deluge of “moderates” that are always a little more right than before in an appeal to voters who want a dictator instead of picking candidates their base actually wants.

        This road isn’t ending well no matter what happens.

      • Psycoder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I dont care who you vote for. It is very clear to me you will vote for Democrats. That is great.

        I do care about who my aunt and her family votes for, a lot. She is democrat leaning. Her husband is republican leaning. They both believe the middle class is getting destroyed by politicians for the last 2 decades. They are both retired. They used to be middle/low income. These days they are clearly low income.

        • In 2004, they both voted for Bush.
        • In 2008, they both voted for Obama.
        • In 2012, they both voted for Obama.
        • In 2016, they both claimed to vote for Trump, although I believe my aunt might have voted for Hillary. (Uncle has military background. He kept saying if he did what Hillary did when he was in active duty, he would be in prison for the rest of his life.)
        • In 2020, they both voted for Biden.

        For the last 2 years, they both are saying that they don’t want to vote for Trump but Biden destroyed the economy for middle class. It was clear they might give Biden another shot if he managed to recover the economy before the election.

        Ever since the debate, they both are dead set on voting for Trump. All I hear is “Of course the economy would be bad, he is senile.” or any “Of course xyz would be bad, he is senile.”

        As I said, I don’t care who you vote for. I care for the votes of people that have not decided whether to vote for Trump or Biden. In the debate, Biden lost a lot of them. Biden lost that debate, clearly! Saying “they both are senile” or “Trump lied during the debate” is damage control by Dems. If Dems insist on going forward with Biden, Trump will be president. I am sure of that.

        Now you can say my aunt and her family are stupid. You can say I am stupid for not changing their minds. You can say Trump is an insurrectionist and we are all stupid. You can even say all of the Americans are stupid, it is your first amendment right. You can down-vote me to hell if it makes you feel good. None of these will change the fact that my aunt and her family will vote for Trump unless Dems change the candidate or Biden manages to shit rainbows and use it to gift a million dollars to my aunt’s family.

        At this point being a Biden apologist is the same thing as voting for Trump. Trump will win.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Democrats will go down blaming the other Democrats that kept warning them of other centrist voters calling them Russian shills.

          No sense of self blame and simply calling everyone else idiots cause they didn’t see their idea of a perfect future that no one else was included on.

          Apparently a whole party of “being right” is not a good way to get others to join you.

        • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t think that’s true. Please consider voting third party and don’t forget about the other down ballot races. 🙂 -just another dude stuck in the same political hellscape

    • SuperCub@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      Agree, this astroturfing is insane. I can’t help but think it’s a coordinated campaign, because Biden was very clearly senile in that debate, if not something worse. Democrats can still win if they let Biden retire and choose someone who can rebut Donald Trump.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        How can someone even expect him to not be senile at this age.

        I can’t help but think it’s a coordinated campaign,

        Social media with bots and shit allow for such, yes.

        By the way, I don’t think the organizers of this campaign want Dems to win. They want Dems to lose.

        It may not be seen from the US and the EU, but Trump’s presidency has helped quite a few disgusting things to start happening in various parts of the world, though they continued during Biden’s presidency.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Just look at my two recent submissions to c/politics that were immediately down-voted anonymously for highlighting FOCUS GROUPS of UNDECIDED SWING VOTERS.

        Not one substantive argument.

        And you know I can’t tell if it’s scared Dems, or astroturfing right-wing operatives trying to ensure we maintain course with this sinking ship.

        • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Dude I’ve been wondering the same thing lately. I’ve been countering the same types. I’ve been referring to him as blue maga.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Try scared democrats who refuse to accept that anyone could disagree with them cause they are right and think by plugging their ears it will just work out.

        • SuperCub@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Are there any communities where we can look at that kind of data and commentary without being censored? Lmk, c/politics is insane.

          • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            c/politics is a radical conservative liberal shithole. None of those people give one single fuck about this country or it’s people. They’re fucking brunch lemmings who round up their change at Whole Foods and think they’ve saved the world

            • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              To be fair, that’s just Lemmy.world in general at this point in time. It’s only gotten worse.

              • Krauerking@lemy.lol
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Rich people who are less and less connected with those they pretend to be on the same side of. There is also a lot of entitlement of thinking they know how everything works and they and only they have the right answers from most of the user base of Lemmy. That’s a curse from everyone that’s here thinking they are “smarter” for being here than traditional social media.

                • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I don’t think many people here are rich or think they are smart just because they use Lemmy.

                  • Krauerking@lemy.lol
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Then you aren’t looking at the self hosting community on here. Or gardening. Or so many other communities. If you are on here you have free time and that’s usually because you are poor or rich

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Bush was clearly the face man of an executive admin that he didn’t run, he was s figure head. Clinton, it was assumed by the press and a lot of the voter base wasn’t running his admin, the first term Hillary was said to be running things and a slew of technocrats was assumed his second term, Reagan, we now know historically, was experiencing Alzheimer’s all through out his presidency, much like Trump, he also had a strict schedule of not even pretending he showed up to work.

      There’s nothing wrong with electing the face of an administration you want in office, this is largely Obama’s admin still running the government, that’s what we all want. Unkie Joe can take all the naps he wants, it make no real difference.

      • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t know why everyone thinks this is some rarely understood point. I think most people get this.

        However, You have to be electable to a country where 30 to 40% of people. Think Trump is a god king who can do no wrong and never lies. Hillary’s administration almost certainly would have been better than Trump’s. Hillary still lost. Biden running as he is now is dangerous. That’s where it makes the real difference. Biden might lose to trump and we might get Trump again. Any other sane and half way competent milk toast politician won’t have that problem. Biden continuing to run is a danger to democracy.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        This is a really important point.

        The president is really only as good as his staff. They can only do so much as an individual person.

        Joe Biden knows how to hire a good staff, and respects the limitations of hisnl office.

        Meanwhile, if Trump could’ve harnessed the energy from his revolving door of “loyalists”, we might’ve been able to stay under 2°C.

        But, part of Project 2025 is actually planning to make 50,000 merit-based non-political positions (basically middle-management, and sometimes lower, at NASA or ATF or Dept of Education or FDA) into political appointments, and fire them if they don’t toe the party line. In order to circumvent Congress and run everything unilaterally.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah. That was a weird comment…

            Biden supporters try to defend Biden, and always end up making the argument that trump is terrible and/or the president isn’t important

            So like, we should just replace him is the logical conclusion.

            But that’s the opposite of what they set out to say.

            • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              The president sets the tone of the administration. Ultimately they are the big boss, but they don’t do everything.

              I take issue with being called a Biden supporter. Biden is mediocre at best. I’dve much preferred if a more…motivational, I guess, DNC candidate in 2020. We obviously knew that whoever won would be 4 years older (and many more battle-worn) come re-election, and it’s pretty unorthodox for any party to let the incumbents president be primaried. I can’t think of a time.

              In fact, I think the DNC was secretly hoping that Biden would’ve bit the dust 2 or 3 years in.

      • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        This is a terrible sentiment. Yes, no leader can do things by himself. But he needs to be present. He needs to understand what is going on. He needs to be able to resolve conflicts and make decisions. And he needs to smell it, if someone is trying to sell him bullshit.

        Do you think the administration is just all great teamplayers who have no agendas of their own, who have no conflicts or problematic histories with each other? Of course not.

        Think of it like any team sports team. You cannot win the superbowl or champions league with a bad trainer.

    • GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think it’s more insane to say that Biden doesn’t have a chance against Trump when he’s already beaten Trump once, which is why he’s President Biden.

        • GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          No, he hasn’t. He’s always been slower and more measured in what he says because he used to be a stutterer, so he comes across less strong in his speech, but it’s his actions that matter much more.

          • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Have you seen this last debate? I would have said exactly that until I saw this one. To me the difference between Biden in this debate vs Biden debating in 2020 is night and day different. So I think it’s fair to say rapidly deteriorating. 🤷

      • nednobbins@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Biden seems to misunderstand why he won.

        He seems to think that people were really impressed with him as a candidate and that since he’s so much more impressive than all the other potential Democratic nominees, he’s the only logical choice to try to beat Trump.

        He certainly enjoyed the support of many people who believe that but he relied heavily on the support of several other cohorts to push him over the edge. Those cohorts didn’t like him. They didn’t like him at all. They just hated Trump more, held their noses, and voted for Not Trump.

        Biden has been telling several of those cohorts that their priorities don’t matter. He had tenuous support from those groups and he took that support for granted. Many of those groups are now thinking, “You failed to deliver on the one thing we wanted from you. I no longer see you as a significant improvement over Trump.”

        Claiming that they’re just throwing a tantrum over a raspy voice further trivializes their concerns and pushes them farther away.

        A clever MAGA troll would make exactly this kind of post. All it does alienate critical voters from Democrats.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s important to remember Bernie was set to have the lead after Super Tuesday.

          Then within like 24 hours of Super Tuesday, pretty much every other candidate dropped out and endorsed Biden.

          It was too late notice for Bernie to campaign in all the states, or for voters to decide. They just followed their candidates advice and voted Biden.

          Biden never had a mandate, and 2020 came down to a handful of states by like 10k votes each.

          Mainstream media has been calling him “the next fdr” for so long I think he legitimately believes. He has no idea how unpopular he is with the average voter, because he doesn’t interact with the average voter. His campaign is tailored to getting donations from the wealthy, so Biden just gets handshakes from the famous and wealthy that tell him he’s perfect.

          He’s insulated from real feedback and believe his yes men.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              The first primary was marred by controversy, as technical issues with vote reporting resulted in a three-day delay in vote counting in the Iowa caucus, as well as subsequent recounts. The certified results of the caucus eventually showed Mayor Pete Buttigieg winning the most delegates, while Senator Bernie Sanders won the popular vote in the state. Sanders then won the New Hampshire primary in a narrow victory over Buttigieg before handily winning the Nevada caucus, solidifying Sanders’ status as the front-runner for the nomination.[6][7]

              Biden, whose campaign fortunes had suffered from losses in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada, made a comeback by overwhelmingly winning the South Carolina primary, motivated by strong support from African American voters, an endorsement from South Carolina U.S. Representative Jim Clyburn, as well as Democratic establishment concerns about nominating Sanders.[8] After Biden won South Carolina, and one day before the Super Tuesday primaries, several candidates dropped out of the race and endorsed Biden in what was viewed as a consolidation of the party’s moderate wing. Prior to the announcement, polling saw Sanders leading with a plurality in most Super Tuesday states.[9] Biden then won 10 out of 15 contests on Super Tuesday, beating back challenges from Sanders, Warren, and former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, solidifying his lead.[9]

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  and one day before the Super Tuesday primaries, several candidates dropped out of the race and endorsed Biden in what was viewed as a consolidation of the party’s moderate wing. Prior to the announcement, polling saw Sanders leading with a plurality in most Super Tuesday states

                  Biden won because every other candidate besides Bernie coalesced around him to stop Bernie from winning as projected.

      • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Did you see the debate last night? That ain’t the dude who ran in 2020. Also I think the political pressure pot of 2020 was unique because people were trapped inside and forced to watch the news even more. People would have voted for anyone but Trump then. There’s still a lot of people that feel that way myself included. But not everyone who felt that way in 2020 feels that way in 2024. That’s just the reality. I really don’t think Biden has it this time.

      • SuperCub@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Biden literally hung his mouth open like a brain dead zombie. He lost his train of thought multiple times… He said “we beat Medicare” ffs. Wtf does that mean?? I want to defeat Trump, but Biden is not going to accomplish that. Change the Democratic candidate before it’s too late.

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Any other candidate just wouldn’t have the name recognition. Millions of Americans just vote for the incumbent regardless of who it is

      • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        If Biden gets out of the way (of his own accord or not) and somebody else becomes the nominee, they will have name recognition immediately. I promise you.

          • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            I hope you find a way to be happy one day stranger. It’s got to be miserable being that angry all the time. 🫂 I don’t think you find the release you need being rude to strangers online but where ever it actually is I hope you find it.☺️

          • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            That is how public perception works. Anyone who became the Democratic nominee between now and the election would instantly be famous. Their name would become a household name within a week. There’s no real way to prove this, but it just seems silly to think otherwise.

            Most Americans do watch the news. The link below is a statistic just about cable news. If you included digital news, the numbers would be even higher. Here’s my source 👈😎 But as you can see 72% of Americans watch cable news.

            I hope that helps ☺️

            • lennybird@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Right, anyone who thinks their name and the attention wouldn’t go viral overnight is clueless. It will go something like this:

              BREAKING NEWS: Joe Biden to RESIGN FROM THE PRESIDENCY; ENDORSES GRETECHEN WHITMER

              For 5 weeks:

              MEDIA: omfg omfg omfg omfg

              SOCIAL MEDIA: omfg omfg omfg omfg

              MILLIONS GOOGLE:: “Who is Gretchen Whitmer!?”

              OBAMA, BIDEN, DNC rally behind Whitmer

              WHITMER’S POLLING & NAME-RECOGNITION: Skyrockets

              At convention:

              MEDIA: Omfg omfg omfg

              GRASSROOTS: ENERGIZED.

              Swing-voters: Happy to vote for someone young and a fresh face because we’re America and we like new less boring shit.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Is this the new liberal bible prayer each night? Keep telling yourself god is real and he loves you Biden will win because he’s a “good” choice for the idiots who don’t know better?