I’m talking about this sort of thing. Like clearly I wouldn’t want someone to see that on my phone in the office or when I’m sat on a bus.

However there seems be a lot of these that aren’t filtered out by nsfw settings, when a similar picture of a woman would be, so it seems this is a deliberate feature I might not be understanding.

Discuss.

  • Kalkaline
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    You know damn well how NSFW is applied on the internet.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Clearly we have a different understanding, how do you apply Not Safe For Work?

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ve often seen NSFW used as basically just “contains nudity”. You could have a woman in skimpy clothing shaking her everything in a manner clearly trying to evoke sexual thoughts, but because her nipples and genitalia are technically covered, it would get posted as “SFW”.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          5 months ago

          Sure, so you want a nudity/sex tag instead of a NSFW tag.

          NSFW would be a superset of nudity.

        • Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Just because some people don’t know how to use NSFW doesn’t mean it means something else than “Not suited for work”. Anything that a colleague, boss etc could see that would result in awkwardness, “the talk”, is NSFW. Same thing for gore.