Nobody could have predicted this. I have my doubts even when they call it “spying equipment” or whatever considering Chinese claim it was a meteorological balloon, certainly no doubt they would try to paint those tools as such.

  • uralsolo [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know in 1984 everybody says one thing while believing something different? That’s this article. The balloon was probably blown off track, the balloon was sent here by china; the balloon wasn’t transmitting anything, the balloon was a spy balloon; etc etc.

    • Wheaties [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, this article feels like it was written so that no matter what you believe, you have something in this you can point to and say, “No, you’re just reading this wrong, it really [was/wasn’t] a spy balloon!”