• alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You know what’s great for getting Cuban votes in Miami? Supporting sanctions and starving out Cuba.

    The gusano voting bloc is mutually exclusive with people who don’t like starving foreign countries.

    There may be hope for Cubans who fled in the 90s due to famine, but the social relations and economic and cultural history of the ones who fled either fearing the wrath of the people they’d exploited or seeking to restore the privilege they had pre-revolution are always going to vote for the fascists.

      • Birbatron@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        This one confuses me, what’s the basis for this being a slur? It’s based in ideology, not race (given that it was invented by cubans for use on other cubans) or sexuality.

        That would make Tankie a slur too, wouldn’t it?

        • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          3 months ago

          what’s the basis for this being a slur?

          It’s a slur just like “Uncle Tom” would be for conservative black Americans, it’s not exclusively racial, but it has a nationalist and racialist element, that’s added onto by ideology.

          That would make Tankie a slur too, wouldn’t it?

          If Tankie was used like Gusano is, to justify violence and to persecute, then I would be against using it too.

          The term was also prevalent in hate crimes against anti-revolutionary Cubans. In September or October 1961, over the course of a week, 12 deceased bodies were discovered over Havana with notes attached to them that said "gusanos with pro-revolutionary [ideologies], CIA agents

          During the 1962 wildfires that destroyed sugarcane plantations, locals in Cubas were reported saying that “gusanos have infiltrated the canefields.”[28] This led to quick military tribunals resulting in death by firing squad for “gusanos”

          But no use of Tankie has ever neared how the Cuban government used Gusano to justify mass persecution of those unfriendly to the regime.

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            During the 1962 wildfires that destroyed sugarcane plantations, locals in Cubas were reported saying that “gusanos have infiltrated the canefields.”[28] This led to quick military tribunals resulting in death by firing squad for “gusanos”

            You mean when the CIA was bombing sugar plantations in Cuba?

            https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=MT19600310&e=-------en--20--1--txt-txIN--------

            Calling someone a gusano is more like calling them a confederate traitor; it implies they want to return to a social order where most of the people were forced to work the fields and unable to leave.

            It’s not a hate crime to punch a nazi, same with someone advocating a return to slavery.

            • YeetPics@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Man, it’s almost like their government gave land for a missile launch base or something at the end of a very long, cold war.

              So weird someone would mistreat a neighbor innocently trying to provide a nuclear Holocaust.

              Edit: here is the /s you weren’t looking for. Be better lmao

              • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                That has nothing at all to do with the US supporting terrorism against random civilians.

                the end of a very long, cold war.

                The cuban missile crisis was in 1962, near the start of the cold war.

                But regarding the cuban missile crisis, the soviets stationed missiles in Cuba in response to the US stationing missiles in Turkey. The USSR agreed to remove their missiles from Cuba when the US agreed to remove their missiles from Turkey.

                But sure the US had to bomb fields and machinery in Cuba, Cuba was coming right for them. Same reason they have to sanction them today, in case Cuba gets nuclear missiles again /s

              • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                They gave them a missile base after the US had already been sabotaging their fields, food, and electrical grids for years and sponsoring random terrorist attacks. Also, they had already attempted an invasion of Cuba by that point with the Bay of Pigs. Of course they freaking wanted help defending themselves. Or does that only apply to the US helping Israel but not the USSR helping other non-settler colonialist countries?

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        it blows my mind how much gusanos and evangelical chicanos & tejanos hold in common and i’m convinced that if they listened to the same music and spoke with the same accent; that they would be indistinguishable from each other.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Cubans tend to vote conservative. They vote that way because the Republicans have done their usual job of non-stop messaging on Democrat = Commie Socialist.

    Many fled Cuba because of castro’s communism, and they understandably don’t want that again. There’s the religious factor, as many of them are catholic and of course the republicans call the Dems “godless” or whatever too.

    There’s also this perverse psychology where people from authoritarian and repressed countries move out to democratic countries and then suddenly miss “the good old days” where reductionist messaging and “strong man” leaders just told them they were strong and flexed at every opportunity, but blamed everyone else when that strength wasn’t effective. Beat those protesters and jail them, send the military to the borders, arrest anyone who doesn’t conform. They want the authoritarian back. And the republicans offer that populist messaging of the strong man who is going to kick everyone’s ass, including the ones in your own country who don’t fit “the norm”. I’ve worked with emigrées (?sp) from both Cuba and Russia and it never ceases to both anger and baffle me that they ran away from shitty, awful dictators and then turn around and want the same thing here in the US.

    • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think what’s missing from your analysis is that they tend to be socially conservative. As in, they don’t like the gays and the atheists.

      • Scallionsandeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        This was also left out of the discussion with Palestinian voters in Michigan at the peak of the blowback for Biden’s support of Israel a few months ago.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Are you implying that Palestinians aren’t going to vote Biden because they’re too socially conservative?

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Well, it’s not really relevant when children are getting killed.by potshots and indiscriminate bombing right?

          Just because someone’s parents are hypothetically massively homophobic, doesn’t mean kids deserve to die.

          (Im not suggesting you are saying that)

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Why would Palestinian voters care about an LGBTQ issue during the “Biden blowback” as relates to Israel? Wouldn’t they care about dead family more, and therefore not vote for anything around Biden, on that reason primarily?

              • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                maybe? Middle eastern people aren’t exactly known for liking gay people either. I was mostly just trying to figure out what you meant with that clusterfuck of a comment.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve worked with emigrées (?sp) from both Cuba and Russia and it never ceases to both anger and baffle me that they ran away from shitty, awful dictators and then turn around and want the same thing here in the US.

      smells to me like it’s probably related to the psychology behind prolonged abusive relationships, or people continually getting into abusive relationships.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      There’s the religious factor, as many of them are catholic and of course the republicans call the Dems “godless”

      As if the Republican evangelicals actually had anything to do with christianism.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      It just surprises me that this messaging is so effective when Trump would love nothing more than to send every brown person living in Florida straight to Cuba, American citizen or otherwise. It’s a very strange sort of political climate where people who fear being deported back to Cuba are voting for the party promising mass deportations because… they don’t like abortion? I can’t quite wrap my head around it.

    • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      You understand that Castro went after than more than just slave owners right? It’s super disingenuous to pretend that most of the 1.5 million people who have fled Cuba were slave owners.

      • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        If they were fine with Batista being a military dictator, but drew the line at someone trying to upend his stint as one, I’m going to ask, why the military dictatorship didn’t cause them to flee every time.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        You understand people fled Cuba not only because Castro was trying to take their plantation or Casino, but because the US has spent over have a century carrying out terrorist attacks and engineered a famine right?

        • BlackLaZoR@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          3 months ago

          carrying out terrorist attacks and engineered a famine right?

          Citation needed

          BTW: You mean that time when Cuba was soviet ally and had on their territory soviet nukes aimed at US?

          Fuck you and your revisionism.

      • BlackLaZoR@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        3 months ago

        They’re cultists. If you talk to them in neutral sub, You’ll find horribly defective logic and broken definitions (“Your definition of Anarchy is wRoNg, anarchy is an organised system!!!”).

        If you try talking to them in one of their sub, you’ll get banned instantly. Socialists/communists are pro censorship and therefore pro coercion. No wonder, every communist state turned into dictatorship.

        • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          I agree with most of what you’ve said, you should read more from anarchist philosophers like Tolstoy or Goldman though.

          Socialists

          However I would subtract the socialist from you comment and just keep it at communist, there’s plenty of democratic socialist parties that never devolved into rampant totalitarianism like the leninist parties did.

          • BlackLaZoR@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            3 months ago

            plenty of democratic socialist parties that never devolved into rampant totalitarianism like the leninist parties did

            I guess you’re right there, still, they tend to be authoritarian - socialism in the soviet controlled republics was rather ugly - centrally planned economy, rationing of everything from meat and sugar to cars and housing, censorship of any political subject in media, ever present corruption, berlin wall to keep people from escaping…

            Not a place you’d want to live in.

            • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              3 months ago

              Not a place you’d want to live in.

              Of course not, which is why it’s unfair to lump in welfare state creators like the demsoc parties of western Europe, and the brutal leninist parties of Asia and Eastern Europe.

              • BlackLaZoR@kbin.run
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                the demsoc parties of western Europe

                They often have socialism in their name, but I don’t really consider them socialist, as you said - they’re welfare state supporters, which is really, really far away from socialism in soviet controlled eastern europe

                • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  which is really, really far away from socialism in soviet controlled eastern europe

                  In that it’s democratic and they want to expand rights from just being political to also being economic? Yes I agree, they’re severely different from the Soviet style parties, but that doesn’t make them not socialist, their left wing members will usually still argue for the ownership of the means of production by workers, usually they just argue for cooperatives rather than mass nationalization nowadays.

                • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  No, of course. Only the bad things are socialist! The good ones clearly are not true socialist! /s

                  You’re pretty fucking stupid my man. Leftism is as broad as anything else, and socialism can take a wide variety of forms and positions. Authoritarianism is the thing that causes issues, and that can be anywhere on the left, right, and center. In the traditional political compass (which isn’t worth much, but whatever) there’s left/right as liberal/conservative, but there’s also up/down as authority/liberty.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          If you try talking to them in one of their sub, you’ll get banned instantly. Socialists/communists are pro censorship and therefore pro coercion. No wonder, every communist state turned into dictatorship.

          are we talking about hexbear? The sub that is insufferably boring?

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      That’s a nice part of accepting refugees from a state like Cuba. You pretty much get to selectively import the right-wing elements of their population.

      Similar effect happens with Venezuelans. The ones who can afford to uproot their lives are also more likely to align ideologically with US politics.

      I used to work with a lot of Cubans. My favorites were the old ones. They would tell me stories about living in Cuba under Castro back in the day. One thing that I always found interesting is how they said they were happier. It might just be nostalgia but I’ve heard from older people from Soviet areas too.

      Life was slower and as long as you did your job certain things were guaranteed to you. In a capitalist system you have infinitely more purchasing power but they would make the analogy of addiction. In the US you are addicted to money so you need to work a lot more to pay the bills.

      Whereas in Cuba you spend a lot more time idle and just living life, even if you’re not able to purchase common items we consider essential. (Some days you go to store and there’s no shoes, next day there’s no bread, etc)

      My least favorite were the 2nd generation ones. Like Marco Rubio. They don’t understand the struggle but feel intensely like they do. Very strong opinions with very little nuance. I’ve met my fair share.

  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Like the people escaping islamist hell holes only to be pro sharia in Europe. And people escaping violence stricken African countries and then end up in gang Fights against their countrymen in Europe.

    These people are just as much part of the problem in their old home country as they are in their new home country. But where probably affluent enough to buy a (very dangerous) trip out of their previous hell and want to make their new home into a nightmare.

    This is not all of them btw… this is a minority of the minority. The problem is, these people fuel the far right as if they are pooring liquid oxygen on the fire.

    If trump ends up elected, I wish these people all the luck in the world. They will need it.

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, it seems many didn’t have an issue with the evil shit just that they weren’t on the top and/or were poor

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      These people aren’t trying to create communism in America, the older generation fled because communism was making society more equal, and they stood to lose, and are the most right-wing mfs you’ll ever meet.

      This applies a little less to the ones who fled after Reagan offered US citizenship and were mostly criminals who chose America over prison.

      And not at all to the ones who fled during the 90s, fleeing famine after the USSR collapsed and the US wanted to make an example out of Cuba.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Correct, but Rubber Duck was implying the people fleeing Cuba were communists trying to recreate conditions of Cuba.

          But no, they’re absolutely not trying to get everyone healthcare and housing and a constitutional amendment securing LGBT+ rights.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s weird to me how many various Hispanic voters are pro-Trump. A lot of them are Catholic and anti-abortion, and single issue voters are nothing new, but still. I just cannot comprehend such a limited perspective.

    • Thrashy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s a combination of things – Trump’s agressive, chauvinistic persona maps well onto Latin concepts of machismo, and there’s also a surprising strain of pull-the-ladder-up-behind-you thinking amongst established Hispanic families aimed at the current wave of migrants.

    • TwinTusks@bitforged.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Many Chinese Americans are also conservatives, not just second or third generation but also first generation when they were the ones that fled China.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      If you break it down on a policy by policy basis (is this policy leftist?) like dems are certainly not leftist. People conflate being “left of republicans” with being “leftist” even though a lot of their positions are quite centrist.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    Citizens and immigrants need to be provided mandatory civics education, especially adults

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s not like Bautista wasn’t a dictator, so the question becomes why didn’t they flee the dictator that allowed you to have slaves instead of the one that wanted every Cuban to have a house and be able to read.

  • 🐍🩶🐢@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    I am terrified to talk to mine about politics. Even though the Suarez’s are cool as shit, when it comes to Trump it is like I am talking to a bunch of terrified children.