Iran's president tells Sir Keir Starmer retaliation against Israel 'is a right' during rare phone call
news.sky.com
The prime minister tells President Masoud Pezeshkian he is "deeply concerned" amid growing fears Iran will retaliate against Israel over the killing of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh.

So Israel break international law and then Starmer asks Iran to just suck it up, saying it will put the ceasefire in jeopardy, ignoring the fact that Israel just assassinated the lead negotiator. What in the bloody fuck?

  • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
    44·
    3 months ago

    I’m sorry, how else would you like us to interpret

    I’m struggling to understand what you think he should have said.

    Followed by

    Since you agree with the UK government that it’s best to settle this through the international systems of diplomacy and justice, would it be fair to say you also agree that Iran shouldn’t respond by attacking Israel?

    Especially in light of the links above where Starmer clearly isn’t impartial.

    • GBU_28@lemm.eeEnglish
      4·
      3 months ago

      Big ole assumption on your part here. You don’t have to cover every side of a situation when you discuss a specific facet.

      Their second quote could certainly be followed by a sentence reflecting on Israel’s massive issues, without losing the consistency of narrative.

    • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netEnglish
      41·
      3 months ago

      I would like you to interpet it at face value. It does not say that I support Israel committing war crimes.