WayeeCool [comrade/them]

  • 2 Posts
  • 53 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 14th, 2021

help-circle
  • The US kill-death ratio is also telling.

    During the Global War on Terror less than ten thousand US citizens killed in the conflict but around a million Afghans and Iraqis directly killed along with around 4 million people across the region indirectedly killed. Even the Vietnam war was something like 40,000 US citizens killed in exchange for around 3 million killed on the Vietnamese side. Hell… the US kill-death ratio in the World War 2 Pacific theater, some of the most brutal fighting the US has engaged in, was only 70,000 US citizens killed in exchange for 2.5 million Japanese soliders and somewhere around 1 million Japanese civilians killed.

    The US has amazing kill-death ratios across all its wars excluding its civil war when busy fighting among itself. It’s disgusting really. The US will lose a few thousand while killing millions on the other side. Even in total war engagements the US loses thousands while the other combatants lose many millions. Since 1775 the US has only lost around 650,000 even when including both the US civil war and World War 2.

    People always make the mistake of assuming during colonial adventures the US is doing anything other than smashing everything up (immediately wiping out the opposing military) then sitting back and milking any insurgency for as long as it is profitable to maintain a low intensity conflict. The US has really only ever fought two conflicts on a total-war footing (Civil War, World War 2) but managed to have hundreds of colonial adventures and so-called police actions throughout its entire history. For most of its history the US has been fighting one or more military actions somewhere, starting with westward expansion across North American then the so-called banana-wars advancing US corporate interests across Latin America and various colonial or cold war adventures across the entirety of the eastern hemisphere.





  • I was going to say… does Ukraine think everyone has somehow forgotten that Russia is the nation that has had globe spanning satellite surveillance longer than anyone else? To make this claim about the US, Russia, China, Iran, or India is ridiculous.

    I guess Ukraine forgot which nations maintain fully integrated domestic space launch capability and large military satellite constellations. Then again they aren’t one of those nations and it’s a capability exclusive to great powers. Ukraine isn’t even in the slightly larger group of nations that have bought a few commercial mapping satellites.




  • In California, Oregon, and Washington the state governments stripped cities of most of their powers related to zoning in regards to blocking conversions to mixed use residential. As long as there isn’t heavy industry right next door (aren’t crazy, no one wants Houston), mixed use residential zoning is hard for cities to deny.

    Los Angeles has the problem (benzene, hydrocarbons, heavy metals) of all the oil wells, pipelines, refineries, crude oil storage, and other oil field infrastructure hidden behind facades all throughout the city. The city and county are an active oil field, something that should never have been approved when there is residential or light commercial literally 25ft away from camouflaged wells, pipelines, and crude oil storage tanks. Then again people over a century ago probably shouldn’t have looked at the natural tar pits and thought to themselves “this is a great place to build a city”.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/09/oil-wells-in-la-nearby-residents-grapple-with-health-problems.html

    New residential arguably is unethical in this situation, especially if it’s lower income housing. Btw, this is the reason building new public schools has been almost impossible in Los Angeles and existing schools all have soil that if there were alternatives would mean shutting them down. Los Angeles and Houston are more alike than anyone likes to admit. Can’t do the type of super fund site remediation (clean up) at the scale actually needed because it would mean tearing the city down to the bedrock to replace all the soil.



  • One senior Chinese finance official who speaks fluent English and is a regular fixture on the international conference circuit told POLITICO by email that he could no longer attend an upcoming event outside China and was unable to speak on the phone.

    He joins dozens of senior finance officials who have been removed in recent months, often after being accused of corruption.

    Hollyshit. This is quite literally the same response you get from any affluent person who is under investigation, regardless of nation. In the US it’s a trope at this point for people under active investigation when reached out to by media to respond that they cannot talk about it, especially over the phone and to journalists who are guaranteed to be keeping a record of the conversation. Media are filled with jackels and anyone with any sense of self preservation will refuse to talk with them, especially directly and not through legal counsel.

    that he could no longer attend an upcoming event outside China

    Yeah! No shit?! It’s called being flagged as a “flight risk” due to having the financial means and connections to leave the country where you have been accused of commiting a serious crime. It’s exactly the same in most countries, including the US. Hell, in the US they restrict your movement even within the national borders (can’t leave specific state) until your name has either been cleared or you are convicted.












  • The 155mm artillery shell shortage is actually ridiculous. The US is choosing to only manufacture a few thousand 155mm shells per month and keep the price per shell high due to the terrible economies of scale when operating a factory with the capacity for over a million 155mm shells per month at less than 2% capacity. The real question is why is the White House deciding to not order 155mm shell production to one million units per month. Why is the White House intentionally allowing artificial scarcity and terrible production efficiency juice the price General Dynamics is allowed to charge per 155mm shell? It’s literally the US government defrauding itself by creating conditions where it has to pay the maximum price per shell when it literally doesn’t have to.

    To explain:

    All US 155mm shell production happens at the Scranton Army Ammunition Plant in Pennsylvania. The plant is US government owned but staffed by defense contractors from General Dynamics. Even though it is a US government owned factory and the factory workers are paid by the government, the contrator General Dynamics is allowed to then sell the US government each 155mm shell the factory produces. By law this US government owned facility has over the years been steadily upgraded to ensure that it can maintain the ability to with only a few weeks notice ramp production back to its full capacity of a little over 1 million 155mm shells per month. The plant has been able to manufacture at this million 155mm shell capacity since the WW2 era and over the years due to upgrades like robotics similar to that used in automotive production if the US military asks for production to ramp to full capacity the factory only needs to hire 1/10th of the new employees it would have needed in the 1940s to maintain that scale of output.

    Anyone with experience in how industrial processes work will find it comical that a facility with equipment spec’d for such large scale production is being intentionally run at around 2% capacity when ATM there is good reason to immediately ramp to full capacity. It is extremely inefficient and costly to run at such low capacity when a factory is tooled for a much higher production scale. At minimum capacity you are having to spend wasteful amounts of money to heat up massive furnaces and forges used to work raw steel feedstock into shells to only run a fraction of the material they are capable of handling through them.