• tquid@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s as if, like, if you are a woman, and also in a disfavoured racial category, like, where they, uh, have overlap? Where they meet? It’s not the same as either one individually but its own, I guess nexus? I feel like there’s a better word for this

        • Mercival@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There’s a somewhat niche, but clever word for this particular combo - misogynoir

          Coined by Moya Bailey in 2010

        • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          @[email protected] has it right, the term and idea is intersectionality.

          apropos of nothing, intersectionality came out of critical race theory’s analyses of black womens outcomes in the legal system. the particular combination of oppression is literally the textbook example.

        • 001100 010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think it’s called a “double minority”, but being a woman isn’t really a minority tho (edit: not a minority in the context of being 50% of the human population) so I don’t know if theres a better term than that.

          I feel bad for people who are black, lesbian, neurodivergent, and trans-woman… like that’s a quadruple minority.

          • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            but being a woman isn’t really a minority tho

            It depends on the context. In a Victoria’s Secret fashion show? Yeah, probably not the minority. In a tech role, which women are systemically harassed and bullied out of pursuing? Yeah, women are probably a minority.

          • CrazyEddie041@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The term is “intersectionality”. Conservatives really hated the term before they went all popeyed over “woke”.

          • ReiRose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not what minority means in the sociological context. Volume is mathematical. Poor people are a minority and there’s more of them than the 1%. Being a minority is about lack of power, prestige and property. And intersectionality is the more formal term, but ‘double minority’ gets the point across.

        • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          idk the point of your snark… people are still figuring out intersectionality. just give some education or stfu, dont condescend to people who are making an effort.

    • Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, online gaming has all but confirmed to me that sexism is very alive and well.

    • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The funny thing is that in my experience female programmers usually have above average skills. I suspect it’s exactly because of this bias against women in tech. Where an average or below average dude can easily get by, this is much harder for women. As a result this bias acts as a kind of filter which results in female programmers being on average a little better than male programmers because all the average or below average ones get filtered out early.

      • Jonna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Here’s hard data to match your experience:

        “This paper presents the largest study to date on gender bias, where we compare acceptance rates of contributions from men versus women in an open source software community. Surprisingly, our results show that women’s contributions tend to be accepted more often than men’s. However, women’s acceptance rates are higher only when they are not identifiable as women. Our results suggest that although women on GitHub may be more competent overall, bias against them exists nonetheless.”

        https://peerj.com/preprints/1733/

      • 6mementomori@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I might add, in the hostile environment women may feel compelled to try harder at least to make a point. As in, “I’ll show you what I can do”.

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is also common in the guitar community. Some women can shred like mofos, and here comes Jim-Bob McGraw saying their playing is tracked etc., ad nauseum

      • MBM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not a perfect example, but I never see people question Henry Cavil’s nerd cred

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even more rage inducing these comments would be the same if she wasn’t conventionally attractive.

      Fucking programmers need a solid clip around the ear.

  • Cubes@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Tbf, the original photo was already discounting her abilities. Saying “can program code” for a lead SWE is saying like “can do calculus” for physicist.

    • odium@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In their defense, maybe the post was written by some journalist with no technical background at all and doesn’t know the difference.

      • spez_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Journalists are expected to do better. Otherwise, just hire anyone because even someone without any formal education could do better

        • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Journalists are expected to do better.

          When journalists were better paid, they did. Now most are stuck in race to the bottom content mills churning out as many posts as possible.

      • Square Singer@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Very much so. Many non-technical people are still very much in awe when someone drops names of programming languages. And it kinda makes sense. If they have no idea, they naturally equate it to spoken languages. And if someone goes like “I speak these 7 languages”, most people would be mightily impressed.

        But if you know a few programming languages, adding another similar one might be a matter of hours.

        • odium@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And that list of languages in the article is pretty standard for a BS in CS: a bunch of standard, common languages and one assembly language.

          • Square Singer@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Likely they covered MIPS assembly at university. MIPS is a comparatively simple architecture and thus is used a lot in CS courses.

            The thing here is, if they really wanted to show off that she’s got a good carreer and doing something remarkable, they could have just done what she did in her comment. List her current position and maybe her education.

            I’d not be very happy if someone were to present my skills and achivements as “Can use these programming languages”.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, once you’re moderately good at programming, language doesn’t matter much. You can pick up a new high level language relatively easily if needed. Low level languages might be harder for some people though, because it takes a fairly different mindset. Personally, I love low level programming, though it’s not very time efficient to write.

      • Square Singer@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, once you’ve got a few languages under your belt, it’s all about concepts. If you end up learning a new language that follows completely different paradigms, you are back to square one. But most of the time you can go like “Ah, so concept X of the new language works similar to concept Y of that language I already know.”

    • souperk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      I won a competition during university, we had to implement a sorting algorithm with MIPS, however required the least cycles to run won.

      I need someone to be impressed by me today, even if it’s for something stupid I did almost a decade ago.

    • oshaboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Considering the guys on the thread don’t know MIPS is an assembly language, I think there’s some projection involved.

      Though I am not sure why an iOS developer would program in MIPS and not ARM. Maybe there’s some sort of crazy Apple MIPS hardware I never heard of… Or they had to pick one architecture and they happened to pick the one that had nothing to do with her company.

        • oshaboy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They obviously meant in the post that she can program in MIPS assembly. And they shortened it to just MIPS. I wouldn’t be surprised if the “Java” mentioned was actually Javascript.

          • SomeRandomWords@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s a very high likelihood that the “Java” referenced is actually Java, since the college that they went to teaches Java as a part of the standard curriculum (or at least they did via UMass Amherst cross-courses a few years ago). With that being said, I agree that it’s likely MIPS assembly being referenced because that’s what most people mean when they say they can program for MIPS.

      • stewsters@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We did MIPS in college, more as a “this is what assembly is” than a practical thing we would use.

  • HeavenAndHell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Claims to be able to program in C++, Java

    “Pfft yeah probably only in Hello World”

    No that’s Elon Musk. He’s full of shit. This Victoria Secret model can actually do something.

        • odium@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s actually pretty hard to do with a codebase as large as twitter’s must be. You would have to locate the frontend code for each front end they have (website, app, etc). For each front end, there will be multiple Twitter logos (different resolutions, icon version, etc.). And then you would have to replace all of them and push the changes through their pipelines.

          I doubt musk can do that.

            • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Elon is a novice when it comes to programming.

              That is obvious to any programmer who saw his antics at the beginning of the Twitter takeover.

              I mean, the guy was claiming the people who added the most lines of codes are the ones with the most skills and are the ones allowed to stay.

              While an amateur programmer needs 100 lines of code, a good programmer can do the same in less than 10 lines. Which is faster, more performant, wastes less resources, and is easier to read afterwards.

              It is literally the opposite of what Musks claims.

  • havokdj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s almost like they don’t know who Ada Lovelace, Grace Hopper, Radia Perlman, etc. are.

  • ApeCavalry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whenever I see someone taking down these absolute bottom of the barrel incel dork on social media, it just feels like shoo-ing a squirrel off the bird feeder. Just not even worth taking action

    • nepenthes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      IMO, it’s always worth it because you dont know who is reading this: I imagine some young or teenage girls might see this-- imagine how they feel when they read the disparaging comments from the incels. Pretty dejected, I’d think. Then imagine how they feel when they read the model/engineer’s reply. It also shows boys what shite behaviour is.

      It’s never a waste to shut the misogynists down-- it’s like investing in your future.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m with you. We don’t argue this stuff to change the original person’s mind, we argue it so that other people reading, who might have tendencies to feel that way, or who are the victim of it, get an opposing point of view.

        • Vampiric_Luma@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Reading comments provide so much perspective. They’ve helped me plenty! Thank you to anyone who tries. <3

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In this case the smackdown has gotten quite a lot of exposure. I only know about her because I’ve seen this same screenshot before.

    • atimholt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Akin to how I feel when I see suggested videos on YouTube which rebut flat-earthers.

  • VanillaGorilla@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was so glad we had a woman join our dev team some months ago. It’s more fun, more relaxed and we are able to get better results as we just cover a wider area of skills. People gatekeeping programming to include only men are idiots.

    • girltwink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That poor girl. My gf’s only female teammate quit last month and i suggested she start grinding leetcode asap. Could you imagine being the only woman on a team? Pretty strong indicator that something is very wrong there.

      • JDubbleu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh, my team is this way, but it’s because we’re aerospace adjacent which further compounds the problem. The only woman on our team is awesome and everyone gets along great. No one has an inflated ego or feels the need to one up each other though, which tends to be the root of the issue in my experience. Lots of tech bros feel the need to put others down, and see women as an easier target unfortunately.

      • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s the same thing with any kind of diversity. Not an expert, but anecdotally, it seems to work better if you start adding diversity at the top. At least people at the senior+ level are generally more comfortable being outliers.

      • rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t think it’s necessarily an indicator of something wrong with the team. it’s not easy to hire women in this industry, there just aren’t that many of them. A team of 10 people with 1 woman isn’t a red flag, it’s unfortunately average. If we’re talking about a bigger team that’s a different story.

        It’s somewhat easier if you hire immigrants. there are definitely more women devs from Eastern cultures than Western cultures.

        • girltwink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You say this, but I’ve been on 5 two-pizza teams over the course of my career, and there were other women on every team except the 2 most toxic ones. My current team at a large fortune 500 is majority women. I realize this may not reflect the entire industry, and some fields may be more male dominated than others. But there are a lot of women programmers out there. You just need to pay them well and give them a good work life balance and they’ll work for you.

          • rambaroo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I do agree that there’s more we could do to attract women. The company I work for is known for good WLB so I don’t think that’s the issue. We only hire senior people every few years and I’m pretty sure we only offer market value, so it’s possible that is a problem.

            That said, I think we actually have more women on dev teams than most companies do. Especially the back end teams, maybe because we have a lot more women in the engineering leadership there. It’s our FE teams, which are led almost entirely by men, where we have fewer women. So if we did start hiring again I’d really like to see us bring in more women at the top.

            I’ve interviewed around 20 people since I started working here and only 3 candidates were women-- I don’t have any control over who the recruiter sends our way, so I don’t really know what kind of bias could be going on there. So it’s possible that’s a problem too.

            All that said, hiring good engineers is really competitive and I think we do struggle against FAANG-likes already. Even though we have a lot of good benefits we have a reputation for being super boring and proprietary (think enterprise software like Oracle, but not Oracle thankfully), which turns a ton of people off. So it’s not easy to attract talented people to start with.

  • solstice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Am I the only one that doesn’t think it’s a waste if a gorgeous person does modeling/acting? If I had a body people wanted to ogle I would be using that power 24/7 instead of sitting here in a shitty office under fluorescent lights pretending to care about work while they pretend to care about me.

  • 2ez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some fragile male egos in this thread. Looking forward to your complaints about the Barbie movie. Sad and pathetic.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know what you’re talking about. For me the fragile egos are way down the thread, all massively downvoted. The absolute majority is supportive.

      • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        People are addicted to rage.

        A few arseholes on twitter saying negative things sets a chain reaction of rage to all those who are addicted to their own emotions.

        The mature thing to do in all cases is to let it go.

        It’s also worth noting that the original comments could be aimed at the fact she is a model, and not because she is a woman.

        #zoolander

      • Orphie Baby@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not everybody’s sorting by Top, friend. They’re probably down there where you say they are though.

    • teamevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My comment on the Barbie movie …Kens belt buckle looks like a liny Metallica logo…horses are rad and Alan is terrible.

      • Ticktok@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because that’s not what the movie is at all. It actually spends a fair amount of time mocking consumerism and hating on the negative impact barbie has had on women’s self image and feminism. It’s actually pretty crass with a lot of offcolor jokes. It’s more targeted to adults who had Barbies as kids during on the 80s/90s.

        • funkless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I did the Barbenheimer double bill. The one that felt like a.commercial was the “YU ESS EH” nature of promoting American War interests.

          • tiredOfFascists@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oppenheimer forces the viewer to strongly consider the awful thing that was done those two days.

            I’m as critical of the US as anyone I’ve met but your take is bizarrely ignorant to what they were trying to do. I feel like you’d have to be intentionally missing the point to come away thinking that movie was pro-america in any way.

            • funkless@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I recognize that both movies (Barbie and Oppenheimer) have some self-depreciating self-criticism of their own meta-apparatus. Oppenheimer’s story - if we keep the narrow focus to just JRO - is a story about a scientist who gains political power through the usefulness of his theories only to lose that political power due to political influences and return being “merely” a scientist with his own tropical getaway, publishing deals, tenure at a university, worldwide fame and recognition and a host of baubles and awards from across the globe, including the USA just 9 years later.

              I think it does read pro-USA, especially to this foreigner who lives and works in the USA. It does not cover the political and medical implications of the New Mexico testing grounds, it does not cover the impact on Japanese civilians from the war (indeed the only victim we see is imaginary in Oppenheimer’s mind). It’s not a particularly interesting story, and its characters barely suffer (in comparison to the suffering they caused).

              I’d argue that it’s propaganda to make it seem like bombing civilian targets in Japan was necessary, worthwhile and agonized over by heroic people. Which you may believe is true, but doesn’t stop the movie from being pro-USA. I’d even argue it’s depiction of McCarthy-ism is self-serving as it seems to suggest, subjectively to me at least, that “look at how far we’ve come.”

              • tiredOfFascists@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It sounds like you have a lot of biases and you did not or would not put them aside to try to view the movie objectively.

                some self-depreciating self-criticism

                Sounds like you think Oppenheimer was a movie that essentially said “teehee- isn’t it fun that the US killed thousands of people and that was bad?! wink [Blasts pop music at a dance party]”

                I think it does read pro-USA

                Interesting, my take is that it was very careful to highlight the nuances surrounding what it means to race to have a WMD. At not one point did I think the film presented anything about this topic as easy to think about. The axis was cast in an extremely fair bad light, and those who sought to remove Oppenheimer’s political power were never shown as justified. I hated every single one of them at every moment, because they were shown in the film to power hungry assholes with zero regard for limiting human suffering in the future. O was trying to limit that suffering.

                How on earth did you fail to understand the basic arc of this story? The protagonist and antagonist could not have been more clearly defined.

                The film also goes to some lengths to show the US in a bad light. Just by telling O’s story – and that he regretted the thing he had helped create – it was a given that the US was not justified in dropping those bombs. That was not changed by having a couple of characters on screen justifying it – that was just telling the story the way it fuckin happened. The only way to tell this as pro-USA would be to exclude the internal struggle O went through. The film literally was 95% about was that struggle.

                its characters barely suffer

                We must not have watched the same movie. wtf

                It’s not a particularly interesting story

                The box office records that were set kind of go against this VERY personal opinion which, included here, weakens your credibility. You went to see a movie you thought was about a boring topic and walked away thinking that still. How a person have think it’s a boring topic, I’ve no idea, but that’s you.

                it does not cover the impact on Japanese civilians from the war

                Sure, you could argue that the Japanese suffering was glossed over a bit, but on the other hand, Nolan treats his viewers like adults. He assumes that if you see this movie, you’re aware of the historical significance of its story. I have seen the Japanese suffering covered elsewhere a dozen times so I didn’t find it an alarming exclusion. The depth of suffering caused by an atomic blast is a 10 hour documentary series in and of itself, so it made sense to me that we could be trusted to already know what that is, to the extent anyone can know what it is who didn’t experience it firsthand.

                I’d argue that it’s propaganda to make it seem like bombing civilian targets in Japan was necessary, worthwhile and agonized over by heroic people.

                I’d argue that it treats you like an adult and lets you come to your own conclusion – and the only humane one – that murdering thousands of people in an instant is morally disgusting. The main takeaway from the film for me: politicians do fucked shit while scientists typically try to do the opposite. Nothing has changed about that, and it was an excellent and thought-provoking movie about that and possibly the most horrible/important invention in the history of humans.

      • Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was a really fricken good movie, way to be closed minded and talk shit about something you didn’t watch

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s annoying sometimes that people just assume that those who don’t work in tech are completely clueless about tech.

    It’s also really funny to mess with people who assumes that.

    • PupBiru@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      as someone who works in tech, the number of people who think they know about tech and are actually completely full of shit dramatically outweighs the people who don’t work in tech and do know what they’re talking about. it can take a lot of energy to differentiate the 2 groups

      dunning krueger is at play a lot, because most people use a computer every day and think they know everything about the internet because they know what DNS stands for and typed a command to flush the DNS cache this one time and it worked

      • BigNote@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        This mirrors the experience of anyone who has studied linguistics.

        Because everyone speaks at least one language fluently, they tend to assume that they understand how languages work, while having zero awareness of the fact that people have spent generations studying language and communication at the PhD level and that almost nothing about what we reflexively intuit about language actually holds true.

        And I say this as a purely amateur linguistics nerd who does not claim any real formal expertise in terms of academic credentials.

      • naticus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, you can’t really fake experience either. I recently joined a group of guys who clearly have had plenty of real world experience in the kinds of things I have, and just talking shop is refreshing. Haven’t had that ability for a long time.

        If someone like her showed up in my team, and she’s able to talk the talk, I wouldn’t need any further validation and it’d be fun to hear the kinds of things she’s worked on.

        Funnily enough, a woman is joining this all-guy group soon and I’m told she’s really good, so I get to do exactly that.

      • ReiRose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t exhaust yourself, just assume that everyone who thinks they know about tech does. They’ll prove themselves wrong very quickly if necessary and you eliminate the risk of getting owned by a VS model.

        • PupBiru@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          except when you waste a crap load of time figuring something out only to realise that the person that says “it can’t be X” didn’t actually know that it was in fact X

          … this is why you don’t argue with ISP support when they tell you to reboot your router: just do it; they don’t know that you’ve done that before you call them, and you telling them that’s not the problem is not going to change anything… it’s not because they don’t believe you specifically, it’s because they just can’t trust that everyone knows what they’re talking about

          the same goes for most IT problems… it saves time in the long run to just assume people don’t know what they’re doing, because problems and systems are both complex and dynamic

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nah, ISP support (and many other support) just have a script they have to go through on every call.

            I agree that rebooting your electronic device will fix a lot of issues.

            But if those from support were actually any good, they would just reboot your router remotely.

            • PupBiru@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              that kind of reboot doesn’t do everything… turning the power off for 30sec completely discharges the capacitors in the power supply, as well as leaving time for things in the exchange to time out and reset

              it’s a quick way of solving a mountain of issues, both client side and ISP side

              some ISPs do have a script, some have better support than that but rebooting is a good strategy for a huge number of things because IT systems are just so complex

          • tiredOfFascists@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Re ISP support: It depends on the support desk person you’re talking to. I’ve talked to idiots who have no clue what they’re doing and thus can’t tell if you do. I’ve also talked to people who clearly knew a lot and could tell I knew enough to make the claims I was making. I obviously prefer the latter. Shame all support can’t be that and usually is just a complete layperson following a script. Deviating from that script at all makes them uncomfortable

      • ddkman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is true, but also IT is a huge place there is an insane amount to learn. So really you spend an incredible amount of time in the “valley of despair”. Basically anyone who brags about their skills is VERY suspect. This person is an iOS developer, which is a great career, but the title of the article is phrased like she was at least Linus Torvalds. I’m sure she had little say in this, but whilst a reaction like this is never justified I can see why people made fun of it. Also it was clearly written by someone who has no idea what the words mean. Unless I’m mistaken MIPS is a cpu architecture, you can’t program in it. You can write machine code “for” it. So yeah I can see why people assumend these claims were lies.

        • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They assumed these claims were lies because they are sexist.

          I work in tech. I taught programming at university. And guys think I have no idea what I am talking about when I am the person correcting their f*ing babies homework. I had men come into my office asking me when the Sys Admin is back in office.

          • abraxas@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They assumed these claims were lies because they are sexist.

            …which is stupid because you don’t pick MIPS and ObjectiveC if you’re just flexing your hobby skills. From the language choice alone I knew she was a developer.

              • ElmAndYew@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes, but I wouldn’t recommend it.

                (I didn’t enjoy Assembly in college and I haven’t written it since)

              • ddkman@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well not really as such. MIPS is a CPU, yes it has microcode, but for argument’s sake, let’s assume the person in the article is not a CPU designer. I’m sure in the slightly sassy reply to internet trolls where he listed every achievement she could think of, being a CPU designer would’ve been mentioned.

                So you can write program FOR a microprocessor. You can either do it in a very low level way, for example writing assembly or even byte code to a CPU directly, or in a very (well relatively) high level way, for example the Net Yaroze development kit for the PS1 (I hope the ps1 WAS a MIPS. The PS2 definitely was). Basically saying that you can “Program in MIPS” makes no sense as such, and to anyone who knows almost anything this hurts the credibility of the article simply.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, and even more broadly, there are very few single things you can learn about a person that tell you anything else about them. Like “Because you’re _____ your must also be _____.” I work with a bunch of literal rocket scientists, and I often see people assume that because they have that kind of job, they probably aren’t creative. Pushing aside the fact that there are giant amounts of creativity in engineering solutions, I know rocket scientists who are painters or musicians. Some who have written fiction.

      I guess there are a few things where maybe it’s valid. There probably haven’t been many NBA stars who suffer from dwarfism. But generally when you know one thing about a person, you just know that one thing. Finding out that someone is an academy award nominated actress doesn’t, in itself, tell much else.

    • Tech is a weirdly wide term. Does it only include IT? Engineering? Astrophysics?

      A lot of work is “tech” as in technology related. It is inevitable to be clueless about a lot of technology, even when being the spearhead of development in one specific field.

      Meanwhile you don’t need to tell the guys at the car-shop about programming, but they most likely know more about every non computer part of the car you just brought to them for repairs, because you were clueless about where that weird sound comes from.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Welding pipelines and building houses is tech.

        Tech being used exclusively for electronics and computing is sort of weird, but idk what else to use.

        Calling it the Tron industry would be fun, though.