• Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Far Cry 6 made some decisions that didn’t make sense to me. I was always running out of ammo, which is something you shouldn’t have to worry about in a Far Cry game. Having essentially just 4 magazines doesn’t go far in a protracted firefight, and the Supremo is inconsistent to use. In Far Cry 5, the amount of ammo you could carry was roughly double the amount.

    You could also change your weapons at any time through the menu (so you’re essentially carrying like 50 weapons) but you can’t change your ammo type unless you’re at a workbench (although I think they fixed this later on), which is the opposite of the previous games.

    The game map is nice and large but it suffers from generic Point of Interest syndrome that is common in Ubisoft games.

    At least the plot was zany at times, particularly the side missions.

    Sad to see our resident AAAA game developer not doing well, but it was largely of their own making here.

    • owsei@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      I haven’t played FC5 nor 6, but the running out of ammo really feels like FC2. Having to scavenge for weapons in the middle of fights or using mounted guns and grenades to kill enemies. Wich I think really improves the game, but it could not be as good in these other releases.

        • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I’m not a fan of the current trend of remakes, but a re-release of Far Cry 2 might be the only thing Ubisoft could make that I’d still be interested in.

          The degrading weapons, fire physics, and stealth* were leagues better than anything in the later games. If they fixed the instant enemy respawning, added more fast travel stations, and toned down the OP DLC guns that made scavenging weapons pointless it’d be a nearly perfect game.

          * YMMV. It had “fire from the brush and reposition while the enemy searches for you” stealth rather than the “crouch behind someone and you’re completely invisible” stealth of later games. I liked it but a lot of people hated FC2’s stealth gameplay.

        • zqps@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          gets attacked by a huge eagle and drops to low health

          Heals himself by removing a bullet from of his arm

      • Porto881@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well you can’t pick up enemy’s weapons for one. Running out of ammo just means going to the loadout menu and selecting a different weapon

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      At least the plot was zany at times, particularly the side missions.

      The main plot was abysmal though. What the fuck was that ending, the kid was just irrelevant.

      4 and 5 had better endings even if they were kind of depressing