Just being direct about the idiotic anti-Palestinian propaganda; and that reporter is a coward for not answering his simple question.

  • Addfwyn@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I love the way he immediately turned it around in the most fair reframing of her question imaginable, and she would not answer him. If anything, he was far too kind to her and granted far too many of her points.

    Literally she could not say “yes” to “do you condemn Israel for killing innocents”. The easiest question in the world. But oh “it’s a pity he couldn’t keep his cool”.

  • soumerd_retardataire@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    If “Hamas” was using israelis as human shields, would Israel still kill thousands of israelis(, or westerners,) in order to kill some of them(, and create i.d.k. how many more “terrorists” in the meantime) ? She would be forced to answer no.

    If Israel had been inhabited by jews for 1500 years, then arabs came and put them in what’s left of their territory, then attacked the arabs/colonizers, would you condemn them ?
    And if these oppressed jews were attacked viciously in a “just” retaliation, creating so many more civilians deaths(, how much is enough ?), would you hesitate to condemn this genocide(, like you did in Yugoslavia, or apparently millions of uyghurs as you forgot(, instrumentalizing/weaponizing human rights)) ? No, we would even support them militarily to prevent a genocide.

    Yet she’s sincere, just doesn’t realize her double standards(, and was chosen for such belief), “Israel had no other choice”, right(, and their 10.000 bombs corresponded to 10.000 precise files on their targets).
    We(sterners) are still worse, i don’t forget how we ourselves treat terrorists all over the world(, «an eye for an eye» is more civilised than our “values”), but only remembered yesterday the death toll of other conflicts, 0.5% of the population of Syria is 110.000 human lives, for Yemen it is 160.000, for Afghanistan 200.000, for Ukraine or Irak 220.000, or for Sudan 230.000, …, we unfortunately did reached such amounts(, and even surpassed, there and elsewhere, now and in the past, perhaps in the future as well once again). But imagine having killed 0.5% of the population in only a few weeks.
    No debate on the solutions either way, a “two-state” solution is a fucking spit in your face, i’d even prefer to lose what’s left of my territory than accepting that, yet it’s apparently the most we can “offer” for the holy land, just remember that we’re the good guys.