• Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 months ago

      They are, well legally speaking at least, and Lambda Legal and the ACLU are defending them.

      • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Right now someone at pflag should be looking for those contact lists they unfortunately lost every copy of right before they were asked.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Recent events have led Paxton to believe that It Happening has broad bipartisan support.

      • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 months ago

        I definitely get the impression people on both sides feel this whole “slavery is bad” thing wasn’t properly addressed last go-round, among other things.

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          They also seem to be really concerned about all the women who are suffraging, and are doing their best to rescue them from such unspeakable and unladylike depravity - whether they like it or not.

          • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            I remember in high school I got a majority of students in my class to sign petitions to end women’s suffrage and ban dihydrogen monoxide. I have not found conditions in the “real world” substantially different.

  • strawberry@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 months ago

    oh so theres not even an attempt to hide behind some “protect the children” bullshit this time? just a clear and direct “fuck you” to lgbtq people? what a state…

  • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Per the lawsuit, PFLAG National states that it would be required to disclose Texas trans youth members, including “complete names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, jobs, home addresses, telephone numbers, [and] email addresses.” It also states they would need to hand over documents and communications related to their medical care, hospitals outside the state, and “contingency plans” discussed among members for navigating the new laws on gender-affirming care in Texas.

    What the actual fuck? Trying to get enough information to ruin them for the rest of their lives. This isn’t only reprehensible from the targeting of LGBT people, it is the worst proposed privacy nightmare I’ve heard of any US based government proposing. I… I need to go throw up.

  • Kalkaline
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ken Paxton can sit on a cactus and have fire ants bite his needle dick.

  • disgruntledbroad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Is it normal, as a Texan evac, to be afraid of joining PFLAG in another state? I used to feel that was just one of my psychosis symptoms, unwillingness to join a formal rainbow group and actually socialize, but now I’m increasingly unsure

    • 1ostA5tro6yne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      they’re just cliques fam, find the good people already in your circle and hold them close. rubbing elbows and trying to fit in with various “queer” groups and orgs as a baby tran was awful for my mental health, you just become a stepping stone for some more privileged person’s clout-building.

  • corymbia@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    You know… it used to be the case that when using an acronym in an article, it was always explained after the first usage in the text. Journalistic editorial standards have really slipped.

    • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s not an acronym anymore. It used to stand for Parents and Families of Lesbians and Gays but they have expanded their charter to include all their members. Since it’s not an acronym, and hasn’t been for about a decade, I assume they decided to to bother to explain what it used to stand for since it’s not relevant to the article.

      In 2014, the organization officially changed its name from “Parents, Families, and Friends of Lesbians and Gays” to, simply, PFLAG. This change was made to accurately reflect PFLAG members, those PFLAG serves, and the inclusive work PFLAG has been doing for decades.

      • corymbia@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Righto. Thanks for the info. I guess international readers aren’t figured into their editorial expectations. It is what it is.

        Thanks again.

    • ThisIsNotHim@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I assume you’re talking about not defining PFLAG? Acronyms widely understood by the target audience aren’t always defined. The LA Blade is an LGBTQ publication so PFLAG not being defined makes sense.