Recently, I was watching a show in which a beloved character was in a situation where they were going to die, but they get saved by their friends.

I find this type of plot to be boring and overused. Why don’t writers let their characters die? I feel it would be more interesting to have an important character die, such as the MC, more often.

It’s an overused trope that most writers tend to use so their story can have a “happy ending”.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Agree. And I really hate it when a character is resurrected somehow. I don’t care if it’s fantasy or science fiction, lack of perma-death is weak sauce.

    (Unintentional irony that it’s Easter.)

  • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Honestly I feel like characters die all the time, to the point that I mostly roll my eyes at it. Yeah yeah, “stakes,” “emotional impact,” whatever, now they can’t be in any more stories, which is bad if I liked them, and also means they don’t have a chance to become more interesting if I didn’t.

  • eagleth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    You should check out “The Magicians”. I won’t spoil it (though I guess even recommending it in this thread kind of does) but it does NOT follow this trope. At least mostly…

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sort of. Trope doesn’t always mean bad. Tropes, like any writing device, can be used well or used poorly. We tend to notice the bad ones that annoy us. We often miss the ones that are a bit more subtle.

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Isn’t the definition of “unpopular” that most people would disagree with something?