I just read a whole article about the price of a car and don’t know the price of the car. “Journalism”
Quick google says $40k. Not expensive, but definitely not a “cheap” EV.
it’s discounted
And even a replying comment doesn’t say the price.
Yeah…sure it is. My brother ordered one 3 years ago and it was delivered last year - during which Ford hiked the price twice, removed features from the trim package, etc.
Each time he was given an opportunity to back out with a full refund of his deposit.
I’m pretty sure they were just trying to cut down the number of required deliveries while they figured out production problems - this discount is probably just returning to pre-hike pricing.
Oh boy, that makes me want it! Take all of my money!
Need your credit score first
Pi
From what I can tell, it’s still in the ~$50,000 range.
I don’t really see how that can be considered ’cheap’.
And it still harvests all your private information to continually make more money off of you
The best defense, it seems, is a cheap EV of our own.
No shit. Proving yet again that auto industry executives are complete morons waiting for another bailout.
Chevy has had a perfectly serviceable and low cost EV on the market for years. It’s possible to buy them new for $30,000 or less (before rebates) and used ones can be had for under $14,000.
It isn’t just about price or being an EV or the Leaf would be the best selling car in the world. People also want a car that isn’t a piece of junk with low resale value, is cramped, or has bad styling. These are big purchases and a lot more thought goes into buying them than two simple checkboxes.
You can’t have inexpensive and all the features you’re asking for though. It’s just not realistic.
I don’t want all the features I just want an EV with 300 miles of range, liquid cooling, and 20 minute charging… Automakers can shove their fancy computerized BS
Hyundai has the electric kona that fits that description for the most part.
Only $38k with outdated batteries that require charge limiting I’m looking for under $25k
Good luck! I think you’re asking too much TBH.
I feel the same way about feature bloat on pickup trucks. I don’t need a tailgate that opens and closes itself, but it’s a mandatory add-on if you want to buy the extended battery for any F-150 lightning. Trucks are meant for work, not loading them up with luxury bullshit.
Trucks are meant for work
When I see the size of them and the pristine condition they are in, I seriously doubt it’s the case for most pick up owners.
Tell me about it. It’s ruined the truck market for those of us that need/want one for work/light duty.
Yeah, how else will they afford a third yacht?
I have an opel and a merc and I prefer the opel. It has all the same features for less than half the price. It isnt impossible.
The US has a problem making shit ugly as fuck if it’s cheaper. We’re still in the mindset that something needs to be expensive to be good, but then complain when it’s expensive. The Bolt and Leaf are cheap because no one wants to buy that shit.
Chevy has had a perfectly serviceable and low cost EV on the market for years
With the caveat that for those years it’s been basically unobtainium. I looked into buying one at the start of last year and five dealers all had none in stock + a 6 month wait. (Their websites listed several in stock but we’ll ignore that other thorn)
They killed production of it to focus on building luxury SUVs (Cadillac Lyriq) and the Blazer EV (starts $42k), so the stock that exists today is all there is. Used ones exist but the problem is they never actually made them in sufficient quantities to meet demand, and instead of ramping up production decided it’d be better to sell $40k-60k vehicles instead.
Bearing in mind they had them in the early 90s. Then killed them. Twice. Now they’re all “ooohhhh somebody’s doing it better” well of course they are, you quit doing it at all until five minutes ago!
The late 90s EVs, like the EV1, were absolute dogshit. They had the styling of a Beluga Whale, a maximum speed of 80MPH, maximum range of as little as 50 miles and a recharge time of 8 hours!
The EV1 was an Alpha release prototype, there was barely 1,000 of them ever made. It was never a serious car, nor could it have been. The technology wasn’t available.
Any “early 90s” EVs were one off custom built toys and would have been even worse than the EV1.
They had the styling of a Beluga Whale
Subjective but yea, I don’t like the look of them either. Leaf either, for a more modern example
a maximum speed of 80MPH
Who cares?
maximum range of as little as 50 miles
Real problem
a recharge time of 8 hours!
I charge my 2022 EV on level 1 so I take up ~3mi/hr and it’s not a problem. Given how much larger my modern EV battery is, it would take far longer to fully charge at home than the EV1 but it doesn’t really matter as my day-to-day driving isn’t that far, which describes the case for most people.
And yet people loved those EV-1’s, even if it’s just nostalgia, and they were capable of handling most peoples commutes.
I never learned what was so “unavailable” about them. Weren’t the batteries lead acid or no and or something in common use? While they suck compared to today and could never have been a primary car, they would have sold in modest numbers as a commuter car, and GM could have evolved it.
Look at the history of Prius: the originals were horrible, expensive and lost tons of money, but Toyota stuck with them and evolved them into a huge, reliable, affordable moneymaker. Todays Prius is a huge leap over the crude original. That could have been EV-1 history
and they were capable of handling most peoples commutes.
No. The first run of EV1s had a literal maximum range of 50 miles so absolute best case your commute could be 25 miles each way and that’s assuming a fully charged battery, no traffic congestion, no use of the heater, and no cold weather. That would also see you barely rolling your car into the driveway as you got home where it would then spend a full 8 hours charging up again.
…they would have sold in modest numbers as a commuter car…
Again no. People won’t buy an EV that will go 200+ miles because of range anxiety. There’s absolutely no way a car with only 50 would have been bought by anyone, ESPECIALLY when the damn things cost nearly $100,000. And that was in 1996/1999 money! Any discussion of the EV1 in a thread about “affordable EVs” is just silly.
…and GM could have evolved it.
GM never stopped working on EV, they just stopped selling it to the public while the technology evolved. If everyone would just stop shitting out about the EV1 and take five minutes to look into it’s clear.
In 2002, one year after the EV1 went away, GM started working on the Hybrid Tahoe and it was eventually released in 2008. It was expensive as all hell, again pushing up against $100,000 but it was in fact a parallel drivetrain SUV with a pile of Lithium Ion batteries under the passenger bench. It could only go a few miles on pure Electric Power but it’s existence showed that GM was continuing to evolve the tech. They were also a great full sized SUV and I loved the one we had.
In 2010 came the Chevy Volt, a hybrid sedan. The first generation of the Volt used the same parallel EV drive that the Tahoe had. It would go about 35ish miles on electric. The 2nd Generation of it was a serial drive EV where the gas engine did nothing but provide electricity. It was made up until 2016.
Then in 2017, literally right as the Volt was discontinued, came the Chevy Bolt which is an actual pure EV with 220ish miles of range.
The Bolt is out of production for 2024 while GM swaps its drivetrain for the new Ultium stuff with a better battery, management system, and more range. It will be back, in upgraded form, in 2025.
So where in that timeline did GM abandon EV tech? They’ve literally been working on it non-stop since they started designing the EV1 around 1992!
Look at the history of Prius: the originals were horrible, expensive and lost tons of money, but Toyota stuck with them and evolved them into a huge, reliable, affordable moneymaker.
The Volt was a direct competitor to the 3rd Gen Prius and they were released within a year of each other. The Toyota got popular while the Chevy didn’t, but that doesn’t mean Chevy didn’t have a car that competed with it.
BTW, where’s Toyota’s affordable EV? You know, the one to compete with the Bolt? Oh…right…
Basically everyone pretends that GM crushed all those EV1s back in '01 and then stuck it’s head in the sand for the next twenty years but it’s just not true at all and in fact GM is the only Domestic US Auto Manufacturer that sells an inexpensive EV.
Go pick on Ford or Dodge, your criticisms might be valid for them but not GM.
And GM tried to cancel it! Idiots.
Did cancel it - a promise to later release a more expensive car with the same name is not the same as revisiting their decision
Automakers don’t care about the used market in the same way video game makers or authors don’t. They only get money from the initial sale. Everyone is trying to move to a subscription model to capture some of that revenue. No such thing as a ‘used’ League of Legends copy.
There are tons of affordable used EVs under 30k. Most of them just don’t happen to be made anymore or have any parts availability without a fabrication shop.
The Bolt is nice, but it’s crazy that it doesn’t have much competition in the US.
Ford didn’t need or take a bailout.
They did ask for one from Congress, and when asked during testimony if they requested money from Mexico or China, the response was, “No, We’re profitable in those countries.”
But Ford mortgaged their brand instead and came out on top.
But why is it so ugly?
Yeah, I don’t know why everything is moving toward that ugly crossover form. They’re ugly as sin IMO.
It’s the carcinization of automobiles. Tall station wagons are simply the most practical shape for cars to be.
Frankly, the thing that bothers me about the Mustang Mach E isn’t the shape, but rather the fact that they desecrated the name of what’s supposed to be a low-slung coupe.
Frankly, the thing that bothers me about the Mustang Mach E isn’t the shape, but rather the fact that they desecrated the name of what’s supposed to be a low-slung coupe.
The shape bothers me a lot, but this bothers me more. They could have just called it the Bronco. Or the Fairlane.
But if cars are all going to look like that in the future I guess I’m never buying a car again.
I would hate this car much less than I do if they had called it anything BUT a Mustang.
Ford should launch a sub-brand called Denver and then launch it as the Bronco. And then sell it exclusively in the UK.
It’s much more like a mustang than a bronco. Regardless, If Ford wants to call it a mustang, it’s a mustang.
Frankly, the thing that bothers me about the Mustang Mach E isn’t the shape, but rather the fact that they desecrated the name of what’s supposed to be a low-slung coupe.
That…that right there.
As much as I hate it, having a 50 year old blue collar welder with 2 Chevy trucks parked out front come over and get excited about “The new Mustang” made me realize how perfect that decision was. People can complain about it all they want, but I don’t think it would have been anywhere close to being as successful otherwise.
Nobody lost money underestimating the American consumer
I think it’s worse than them being ugly. I think the dimensions and visibility for crossovers makes people worse drivers. Massive blind spots, zero rear visibility, huge amounts of body roll in curves, and the danger of rollover are all worse in this body scheme.
It’s so bad that they have to add technology like rear cameras, BLIS, and traction control to attempt to fix it because they can’t just make a car with reasonable dimensions and good sight lines.
The MachE doesn’t really suffer from any of those issues. I had no major blind spots, in fact smaller than what I’ve been used to. Rear view mirrors were very effective, it’s a “Mustang like suspension” so it was super stable, to the point of uncomfortably stiff. With the battery pack underneath, the center of gravity makes a roll over extremely unlikely.
Your points are accurate for many other CUVs, especially ICE ones. But not the MachE. It has its own issues mind you. Specifically the suspension being so bumpy it induces car sickness. A, frankly, obscene amount of power which tempts bad driving habits. And the worst central control system I’ve ever experienced.
You just listed a bunch of features that are standard on most vehicles these days.
And the reason they’re standard is because the cars aren’t built correctly
Rear cameras were mandated after a bunch of kids playing behind their parents car were run over, traction control exists because road conditions change throughout the year in most areas and blind spot monitors exist because all cars have blind spots and it reduces collisions. Saying all cars are built incorrectly with zero supporting argument isn’t much of an argument. Cars are safer than they’ve ever been and much of the sight line issues are related to reinforced pillars to protect occupants in a crash.
Sorry, I forgot the Internet is Serious Business™
Well nobody forced you to make unfounded declarations as if you’re a subject matter expert.
lmao you really pulled a “it’s just a prank, bro!”
The yellow is indeed bad. But it’s still one of the better looking EVs…
I much rather take my old car and pay to have the ICE engine taken out and replaced with a crate EV motor.
The problem is not the motor (as much) as it is where to put the batteries. Replacing just the gas tank on my tiny Subaru with a battery is not going to give the range I need.
Ya, unfortunately that’s the problem. But the majority of people don’t need to drive over 100 miles a day and most kits these days are over 100 now.
That take only works for families with multiple cars. A car would be pointless for me with a less than a 450km (280m) range.
That is a crazy commute. What line of work are you in that requires that much driving a day?
That’s not a commute. I don’t commute by car at all. I bike or take transit if I have to commute. A cars sole purpose for me is long trips with the family and going to the cottage, which is 320km away.
Not OP but a rural Canadian and farmer, I live 200km from the city. While I usually only go once every week or two, if I can’t make it there and back for any number of supplies that I might need in a hurry (parts, veterinary, hospital etc) then a vehicle is useless to me.
Even if the published range could barely squeeze it in, with winter temperatures dropping into the -30s any reduction in range would be a huge issue.
The thought of being badly injured while my car is sitting low on charge is terrifying. I always keep over 1/2 a tank in my car and also in my 4wd farm truck in case of bad weather.
Honestly the drop in kits are not for everyone. It’s really for people with a pure commuter car and a longer range vehicle that could be a hybrid, PHEV, All new electric or even ICE engine. Considering the average American family has over 2 cars, it’s quite possible.
I do own a little electric jeep with around 10 miles of range, it’s great for around the farm use. That’s where I like having the farmyard with plenty of room, I can keep special purpose vehicles.
It’s kind of a conversion-ish thing itself, Pinto transmission and rear end, heavy old 8hp series motor. 1970s electric tech.
The big killer here is insurance. I’m lucky to insure it as an antique for very little money, but if you have to insure a special purpose car it’s often not worth the fuel you save. I think they should have a special insurance program for short range cars, as you clearly can only drive one car at a time.
It’s also the same BS excuse every lazy ICE adherent makes. “Bwaaah I needs to drive over five hundy miles a day.” It’s nonsense and I’m quite comfortable calling it a lie. You might want to take a 500 mile road trip. But not every day you don’t ya lazy liars.
And yes: there exist occupational life choices that lead one to a life where you might travel that distance in a single day. But in your own personal vehicle?
Lies.
That would probably be way more expensive
Well, I have an old Audi TT that’s completely paid off. There is a 13k drop in kit for the Mk3 and MK4 VW golf which is the same chassis.
It’s only a little over 100 miles so there is that and I’m going to lose the Quattro, so it’s something that needs to be considered.
