The comparison between narcissism and anger management problems and pedophilia is much closer than autism, schizophrenia, or even just basic anxiety.
These people have problems with inhibitions that would ordinarily stop them from abusing other people. Not every mental disorder demands accomodation in the same way.
Sorry you thought you found one of life’s cheat codes. You’ll always be searching for those
I feel like you’re attempting a sleight of hand here to, in getting us to defend the user with NPD, to paint us as defending paedophiles.
I do not nearly know enough to discuss NPD, but I also think you’re being dishonest by grouping those two disorders together.
I’m want to call you out on this now, because I want other commenters here, who know more of the context of your disagreement and have better knowledge about these topics, to be aware.
You’re so fucking pathetic trying this debate bro shit here. You have no fucking clue how many smug dipshits like you we brush off regularly. Just pack it up bud, go outside. I think you need some fresh air.
Have you checked your apartment for black mold? I know that can really fuck your brain up.
I don’t browse that comm, nor do I have YouTube (except for music) or TikTok, and I disavowed any expertise on the subject.
However, I think that the construction of your -argument- before is trying to draw users into defending a group category that you have drawn, which includes paedophilia, then if anyone were to defend that group that you drew, or another item within it, you would then call them out as defending paedophilia. I am not discussing definitions or diagnoses.
It appears to be similar to a dishonest debating tactic and I want to call you out on it in advance.
This is not a dishonest debating tactic and you are defending the idea that people with inhibition problems that threaten others need accomodations in the form of never being called out
Imagine we stopped using “mad” because some people have anger issues.
Imagine we stopped using “nonce” because, some people are pediphiles.
Imagine we stopped using “narcissist” because some people are narcissists.
Doesn’t make any sense. They’re pejorative for a reason. These are abusive tendencies towards others.
I’m going to leave it there cos I’m sleepy. The one concession I’ll grant you is that you may have become a little confused since a number of us are using the same profile picture.
I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that at some point in this thread you may have gotten me mixed up with another user. Please re-read the thread again and pay attention to the usernames if that is the case.
you are defending the idea that people with inhibition problems that threaten others need accomodations in the form of never being called out
And there it is. I said nothing of the sort. Read my comments again. I never discussed any pathology at all.
Literally right after I call you out for saying you would try to paint one of us as defending a group category [people with inhibition problems] you go ahead and do just that.
if the user in question hadn’t posted about getting help, I might agree with you. but I’ve had my mind changed. running to 4chan to bully people is coward shit.
That doesn’t have any relevance to the conversation about the use of the word constituting a slur.
The latter two points are just conjecture. I told you I happened to find hexbear screenshots on “chans”. I happen to agree with the takes. You’re just assuming that the takes were on 4chan.
Sorry but I actually know a thing or two about psychology (not from Tiktok) and I’m not terribly swayed by forum users going off out-of-context screenshots
It’s extremely hilarious to see all these midwit redditors wandering in, seeing new ideas to them framed in ways they have never considered before, whose mental fortitude just collapses and all they can do is insist that a bunch of leftists who have been exposed to liberal bullshit their entire lives and everywhere outside of Hexbear, must be the ones shuttering themselves into an echo chamber. You’re the first one to grasp for a philosophical metaphor (and fail, of course) but it’s all the same shit. Ignorant, uninteresting liberals panicking at new ideas and trying to comfort themselves with any possible excuse.
Yeah, see, you’ve had Platos Cave explained to you and you’re still misusing it. No one is that stupid, so the bit becomes too obvious. You messed up the bit.
My fellow Hexbear users aren’t familiar with all the logical fallacies we should avoid in debates, so we tend to use ad hominems and such way too often. We especially use the Preconception Prejudice Bias too much, link if you’re unfamiliar.
This is also much like when pedophiles try to include themselves in the “neurodiverse community”
The comparison between narcissism and anger management problems and pedophilia is much closer than autism, schizophrenia, or even just basic anxiety.
These people have problems with inhibitions that would ordinarily stop them from abusing other people. Not every mental disorder demands accomodation in the same way.
Sorry you thought you found one of life’s cheat codes. You’ll always be searching for those
I feel like you’re attempting a sleight of hand here to, in getting us to defend the user with NPD, to paint us as defending paedophiles.
I do not nearly know enough to discuss NPD, but I also think you’re being dishonest by grouping those two disorders together.
I’m want to call you out on this now, because I want other commenters here, who know more of the context of your disagreement and have better knowledge about these topics, to be aware.
This is similar to how people call sexuality a “drive” when it’s just an incentive reward system in the brain, not a survival thing.
You’re so fucking pathetic trying this debate bro shit here. You have no fucking clue how many smug dipshits like you we brush off regularly. Just pack it up bud, go outside. I think you need some fresh air.
Have you checked your apartment for black mold? I know that can really fuck your brain up.
You all have literally learned psychology from youtube and tiktok, that’s where all the resources in /c/[email protected] lead
I don’t browse that comm, nor do I have YouTube (except for music) or TikTok, and I disavowed any expertise on the subject.
However, I think that the construction of your -argument- before is trying to draw users into defending a group category that you have drawn, which includes paedophilia, then if anyone were to defend that group that you drew, or another item within it, you would then call them out as defending paedophilia. I am not discussing definitions or diagnoses.
It appears to be similar to a dishonest debating tactic and I want to call you out on it in advance.
This is not a dishonest debating tactic and you are defending the idea that people with inhibition problems that threaten others need accomodations in the form of never being called out
Imagine we stopped using “mad” because some people have anger issues.
Imagine we stopped using “nonce” because, some people are pediphiles.
Imagine we stopped using “narcissist” because some people are narcissists.
Doesn’t make any sense. They’re pejorative for a reason. These are abusive tendencies towards others.
I’m going to leave it there cos I’m sleepy. The one concession I’ll grant you is that you may have become a little confused since a number of us are using the same profile picture.
I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that at some point in this thread you may have gotten me mixed up with another user. Please re-read the thread again and pay attention to the usernames if that is the case.
I’d like you to do better too. Thank you so much for engaging in good faith Comrade™️
And there it is. I said nothing of the sort. Read my comments again. I never discussed any pathology at all.
Literally right after I call you out for saying you would try to paint one of us as defending a group category [people with inhibition problems] you go ahead and do just that.
How does not calling out negative behaviors help people who are themselves trying to limit them
if the user in question hadn’t posted about getting help, I might agree with you. but I’ve had my mind changed. running to 4chan to bully people is coward shit.
That doesn’t have any relevance to the conversation about the use of the word constituting a slur.
The latter two points are just conjecture. I told you I happened to find hexbear screenshots on “chans”. I happen to agree with the takes. You’re just assuming that the takes were on 4chan.
DEBAAAAATE MEEEEEEE!!! WAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!
Shut the fuck up nerd.
You’re doing Stalin’s work comrade
Holy shit this is the dumbest shit I’ve ever heard.
This has gotta be a bit. No way this guy is real.
Sorry but I actually know a thing or two about psychology (not from Tiktok) and I’m not terribly swayed by forum users going off out-of-context screenshots
The psychology bachelor’s degree haver has logged on
Basic competency and reading comperhension haver
Says the guy who consistently does not understand Plato’s Cave, a literal intro to philosophy concept covered in one or two lectures
Removed by mod
It’s extremely hilarious to see all these midwit redditors wandering in, seeing new ideas to them framed in ways they have never considered before, whose mental fortitude just collapses and all they can do is insist that a bunch of leftists who have been exposed to liberal bullshit their entire lives and everywhere outside of Hexbear, must be the ones shuttering themselves into an echo chamber. You’re the first one to grasp for a philosophical metaphor (and fail, of course) but it’s all the same shit. Ignorant, uninteresting liberals panicking at new ideas and trying to comfort themselves with any possible excuse.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Yeah you’re just being cringe on purpose now. The smug Redditor parody is way too obvious to be real. Sorry, the bit is old now.
This is a narcissistic circlejerk within the Plato’s Cave of the western left, watchers of the shadows projected by the US polity 🧐
The definition of cringe here is being anything outside that
Yeah, see, you’ve had Platos Cave explained to you and you’re still misusing it. No one is that stupid, so the bit becomes too obvious. You messed up the bit.
You’re just doing the site bit of deliberately misunderstanding things when it suits you to “own the chud”
I’ve pointed out before you’ll say a house rep with like 6 kids has “incel energy”
Incel is a state of mind. Like you might have children of your own (I seriously hope you do not) but I would still say you have incel energy.
My fellow Hexbear users aren’t familiar with all the logical fallacies we should avoid in debates, so we tend to use ad hominems and such way too often. We especially use the Preconception Prejudice Bias too much, link if you’re unfamiliar.