• UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s enough that’s unclear or not yet understood for me to say that claiming “in all fairness” that the human brain is just an algorithm/meat-computer/whatever is lazy and arrogant reductionism, that’s for sure.

    Someone with a hammer, as the saying goes, thinks everything is a nail.

    And a computer toucher wants everything to be neatly fitting into computer programming.

    • Tastysnack [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was a neat analogy for the time.

      Kinda like how “I’m a woman trapped inside a man’s body” is reductionist for explaining the trans femme experience and transness academically but if you want a quick snappy one liner it can deliver a simple explanation to reduce wild misunderstanding in a layman but anyone who’s a redditor will take it too far.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can see it being comparable.

        I take issue with the extraordinary and reductionist claim of that’s all it is, prefaced with “in all fairness” as if to will computer toucher feelings into hard irrefutable reality. It’s like when someone says “let’s be honest” to preface an opinion where it isn’t just their “honest” opinion but an implication that it should be everyone’s “honest” opinion if they are “honest” as well.