• Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s like saying a person reading a book before a quiz is doing it open book because they have the memory of reading that book.

      • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Except it’s not, because they can’t perfectly recall everything.

        It’s more like reading every book in the world, and someone asking you what comes next after “And I…”.

        • DessertStorms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          But the AI isn’t “recalling” in the same way you do, it doesn’t “remember” what it “read”, it “reads” on demand and has instant access to essentially all of the information available online it was trained on (E: though it’s becoming more or less the same thing, and is definitely the same when it comes to law books for example), from which it collects the necessary details if and when it needs it.

          So yes, it is literally “sat” there with all the books open in front of it, and the ability to pinpoint a bit of information in any one of all the books in milliseconds.

          • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            It doesn’t read on demand, it reads once when it’s being trained, and it later recalls what it learnt from that training.

            Training LLMs takes a very long time and a lot of hardware power.

              • 8uurg@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                These models have so many parameters that, while insufficient to memorize all text it has ever seen, it can end up memorizing some of the content. It is the difference between being able to recall a random passage versus recalling the exact thing you need. Both allow you to spill content verbatim, but one is problematic while the other can be helpful.

                There are techniques to allow it it ‘read on demand’, but they are not part of the core model (i.e. the autocmpletion model / LLM) and are tacked on top of it. For example, you can tie it search engine, which Microsoft’s copilot does, and is something which I don’t think is enabled for ChatGPT by default. Or allow it to query a external data bank (Retrieval Augmented Generation).

            • DessertStorms@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              It doesn’t read on demand

              Yes, it does, from the information it was trained on (or - stored), which like you say, requires a lot of hardware power so it can be accessed on demand. It isn’t just manifesting the information out of thin air, and it definitely doesn’t “remember” in the same way we do (E: even the best photographic memory isn’t the same as an indexable one).

              • abruptly8951@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                6 months ago

                It’s definitely not indexed, we use RAG architectures to add indexing to data stores that we want the model to have direct access to, the relevant information is injected directly in the context (prompt). This can somewhat be equated to short term memory

                The rest of the information is approximated in the weights of the neural network which gives the model general knowledge and intuition…akin to long term memory

                • self@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  or it can be equated to a shitty database and lossy compression (with artifacts in the form of “hallucinations”), but that doesn’t make the tech sound particularly smart, does it?

                  but half the posts in your history are in this thread and that’s too many already

        • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I mean you still gotta understand some shit for Ctrl+F to be helpful. If you’ve ever taken an open book quiz without prior study you’ll learn pretty quick that open book does NOT = easy A (depending on the class / prof I guess, but you get the gist).

          So, open book Ctrl-F’able bar exam, I could probably get an okay score just on key word matching, not knowing jack shit about law; but it’d be far from a perfect score. Current state of machine learning appears to be in a comparable boat.

            • froztbyte@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              6 months ago

              your post shows a serious lack of comprehension. just because so many of the posters in this thread are idiots didn’t mean you have to participate too.

              (CPU time extremely counts, and resource-wise with these things it’s really quite a lot)

              • V0ldek@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                6 months ago

                Steelmanning what this person said, I think the issue is that your ability to CTRL+F through a book during a time-limited exam is not as strong as even a single computer clocked at GHz doing the same thing. You can CTRL+F through a single book in the same time it takes it to CTRL+F through the entire body of knowledge.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I’m not a big AI guy but it’s really not quite like that, models do NOT contain all the data they were trained on.

        Edit: I have no idea what’s going on down below this comment

          • Jarifax@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            The guy above you is right though. So what are you on about?

            • self@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              6 months ago

              what a weird opportunity for someone to burn a throwaway account. not even gonna dig into what you’ve imagined the other guy is right about, given he didn’t post any information of value

              • xantoxis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                6 months ago

                Lemmy is starting to have a huge problem with people creating multiple sockpuppets–probably programmatically generating them, in fact–just to win internet arguments. If this goes on too long you’re going to see a really surprising number of sudden downvotes on everything you’ve said in this conversation, and anyone who agreed with you.

                • froztbyte@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  It’ll actually be good if that happens because 1) it could be dealt with here, 2) that could be used to feed something that helps defend against it

                  (e: I mean, it’ll be a nuisance, and @self would be driven to drink, but it could still be handled)

                • self@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I truly wish those so inclined good luck with the downvotes and with coordinating their sockpuppets in a way that isn’t extremely fucking obvious

                • froztbyte@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  you need to work on your reading comprehension skills, they’re letting you down on your left-field brigading

        • sc_griffith@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          that’s a misleading and meaningless way of putting it. if I rip a page out of my textbook and bring it into an exam room, I do not have with me all the data in my textbook. and yet

          • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            It doesn’t do that, either. LLMs retain the linguistic patterns found in textbooks, nothing more. It’s remarkable that they can do so much with this information alone, but it’s still a far cry from genuine intelligence.

            • zogwarg@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              And yet they can spit out copyrighted material verbatim, or near-verbatim, how strange and peculiar.

            • Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Yeah, even setting aside the intelligence claims, I know I’d be feeling a lot more positive about LLMs as a fun theoretical tool if they weren’t being sold as personal assistants or search engine replacements etc, which even the apologists here admit they’re really really bad at.

              (Also I’d argue “linguistic patterns” is pushing it. “Textual patterns” more like, it’s not supposed to have any idea about grammar or even about what “text” is.) (I say “supposed to” because who knows what sort of hacks they’re running under the hood.)

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Modified Thursday, May 16th, 2024 at 9:17:13 AM GMT+02:00 Edit: I have no idea what’s going on down below this comment

          lol. at least you’re honest about it

    • V0ldek@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I’m not even going to engage in this thread cause it’s a tar pit, but I do think I have the appropriate analogy.

      When taking certain exams in my CS programme you were allowed to have notes but with two restrictions:

      1. Have to be handwritten;
      2. have to fit on a single A4 page.

      The idea was that you needed to actually put a lot of work into making it, since the entire material was obviously the size of a fucking book and not an A4 page, and you couldn’t just print/copy it from somewhere. So you really needed to distill the information and make a thought map or an index for yourself.

      Compare that to an ML model that is allowed to train on data however long it wants, as long as the result is a fixed-dimension matrix with parameters that helps it answer questions with high reliability.

      It’s not the same as an open book, but it’s definitely not closed book either. And the LLMs have billions of parameters in the matrix, literal gigabytes of data on their notes. The entire text of War and Peace is ~3MB for comparison. An LLM is a library of trained notes.

      • Ozone6363@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m not even going to engage in this thread cause it’s a tar pit, but I do think I have the appropriate analogy.

        Proceeds to actively engage in the thread multiple times

        • V0ldek@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I never claimed to be good at self-restraint okay, everyone has their vices

          You’re acting as if you never ate a full bar of chocolate after you told yourself you wouldn’t

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        My question to you is how is it different than a human in this regard? I would go to class, study the material, hope to retain it, so I could then apply that knowledge on the test.

        The ai is trained on the data, “hopes” to retain it, so it can apply it on the test. It’s not storing the book, so what’s the actual difference?

        And if you have an answer to that, my follow up would be “what’s the effective difference?” If we stick an ai and a human in a closed room and give them a test, why does it matter the intricacies of how they are storing and recalling the data?

        • V0ldek@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m not sure what you even mean by “how is it different”, but for starters a human can actually get a good mark at the bar and spicy autocomplete clearly cannot.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            6 months ago

            spicy autocomplete clearly cannot.

            What you are basing this “it clearly cannot” on? Because an early iteration of it was mediocre at it? The first ICE cars were slower than horses, I’m afraid this statement may be the equivalent of someone pointing at that and saying “cars can’t get good at going fast.”

            But I specifically asked “in this regard”, referring to taking a test after previously having trained yourself on the data.

          • V0ldek@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Give Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie billions of dollars

            I mean, if we took all net worth of Sam Altman and split it between these two guys who at least benefited humanity with their work we’d get at least a step closer to justice in the universe.

            Getting a Turing award: $1M

            Dropping out of Stanford to work on something unironically called “Loopt”: Priceless

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          holy fuck you’re a moron

          please go read a book, and look at some art. no, marvel media doesn’t count.

          • JohnBierce@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            6 months ago

            Me, about to suggest some actually really good, thought provoking Marvel comics that somehow got made alongside the relentless superhero soap opera: oh wait now isn’t the time, we’re dunking on the AI bro

    • bitfucker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      The word parameters here must be defined. Is it the weight they are talking about or the input being used to answer the question? For the former, yeah, it’s like a person was reading a book and not an open book at all. But if it were used in the input, then it is practically an open book. They have the context on the same input.