Whenever they have a spike in demand, the de-regulated prices go up by several hundred percent. Example

  • remotelove@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    More questions here than answers, unfortunately.

    It’s my understanding that there is a cap at $5000/MwH ($5/kwH). That is still hella expensive, but would only be for a day or two at maximum?

    For the headlines of +$16000 power bills, that is probably a one-off for heavy power consumers, like businesses that have massive freezers and such, correct?

    • AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not correct.

      I have coworkers in Texas that got hit with multi thousand dollar bills during brown outs.

      Deregulating critical services never ends well for the consumer.

    • Kalkaline
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      4 months ago

      I have a friend from high school that got hit with a something like $20,000 bill because he signed up for some discount program on his electric bill. The freeze a couple years ago did similar things to demand and he got hit with a massive bill.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ok, that clears up my misunderstanding then. I was thinking that the cap applied across the board. (That does change things a bit, don’t it?)

    • meco03211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      A properly insulated industrial freezer should consume less electricity than a house with AC, even if it’s set at a reasonable temp.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m curious as to how this would compare to a properly insulated home?

        most the houses in texas are uninsulated to keep construction costs down. (despite the fact that even a minimal amount of insulation would pay for itself inside of a year or two.) (Why would you want to insulate against heat, right? global warming is a woke-ist hoax! /s)

        • bitchkat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          New houses or ones built in the 1960’s? If its new houses, how does code not specify a minimum R value? Its not just about keeping heat in in the winter, its needed to keep the heat out in the summer.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            texas doesn’t require a specific r-value for walls in the southern third of the state. (the rest it’s r-5). They do require some insulation in an attic.

            Most (cheap) homes don’t slap up insulation if they don’t have to. and r-5 is an extremely low value.

            and further, that’s only on new houses. There’s plenty of old houses still in circulation and the vast majority of the old houses are entirely uninsulated. a properly insulated house, you can keep rooms warm just by being in them. we saw that’s not true of homes in texas during the big freeze a while back.

            Its not just about keeping heat in in the winter, its needed to keep the heat out in the summer.

            that’s this sarcastic comment was about:

            (Why would you want to insulate against heat, right? global warming is a woke-ist hoax! /s)

            • bitchkat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              When I was growing up the people across the street had an uninsulated houses – in NW Wisconsin.

              I guess Texas is going to do Texas things but with the heat and the grid falling apart every couple of years, they really should mandate the same level of insulation that we do up north.

              • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                Yeah… I’m in MN.

                It’s not like we don’t get triple digits ourselves in recent years. And it really does come down to shaving down those construction costs. The insulation would pay for itself in like 2 years, though.

              • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                they really should mandate

                That sound you hear is Texas loudly pushing back on any sort of gubmint infetterance.