In the United States, I’d probably name Oregon City, the famous end of the Oregon Trail and the first city founded west of the Rocky Mountains during the pioneer era. Its population is only 37,000.

  • nis@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 minutes ago

    In Denmark it’s probably Snave (No English Wikipedia page for it). Population is a whopping 211 people. It was popularized in a series of commercials for a Danish cellular carrier. The concept was so popular that there even was a movie. I haven’t seen it, but the reviews seems to suggest it could be fun to watch… If you are drunk enough.

    The word “snave” in Danish can somewhat be translated to snogging in English. Heavy kissing. Which has led to the city having massive problems with theft of their signs.

  • nfh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 minute ago

    Not my country, but what immediately came to mind was one that has global name recognition, and minimal population: Chernobyl.

    It used to have around 12,000 population, but now it’s technically illegal to live nearby, and up to 150 people are estimated to live there today. It’s famous for being toxically irradiated as a result of the worst nuclear disaster in human history

  • Ving Thor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 minutes ago

    The village “Wacken” is well known in Germany because they hold one of the worlds largest anual Heavy-Metal festivals. They have a population of around 2000, the festival regularly attracts around 80,000 people.

    • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I’d try Bodom, population 0, if other than cities are allowed.

      Or possibly Santa’s village, population 2 (if you exclude the elves)

  • moreeni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Chornobyl, Ukraine. “50 thousand people used to live here, now it’s a ghost town”

    There are many more ghost towns now, due to the war. Adviivka, Bakhmut and many others, some small, some relatively big. Everyone has heard of those small cities.

  • Zloubida@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    For France it’s probably Vichy, infamously well known internationally for being the capital of the French pro-Nazi government during the Occupation. Only 25’000 inhabitants.

  • ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I guess the one that pretty much everyone knows in Germany is Buxtehude. It is being used as the poster child for a backwards town, far away from cities. Which is funny because neither is it backwards, remote or even very small. With a population of 40k it’s relatively large, compared to many other places in Germany, even just right next to Buxtehude. It is not far from Hamburg and its historic core is worth a visit. I think the name itself is the reason why it is being made fun of so much. Though there are so many other, much quirkier named towns in Germany but it somehow became Buxtehude.

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Oregon City would be my answer to ‘what’s the capital of Oregon?’

      Just a standard, since I never heard of the capital I’ll try the state name plus city guess.

    • boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I am not in the US. Never heard of Oregon City. But Atlantic City sounds really familiar.

      • 69420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I too have never heard of Oregon City. I can only assume it’s in Oregon. The only thing I remember about the Oregon Trail is that I died from dysentery every time I followed the trail.

      • fjordbasa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It was popular, but I think most folks who played it remember dying of dysentery, not the cities 😆

      • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        We were taught about it, but most Americans don’t view westward expansion with the same… Reverence? Notoriety?

        Like, I remember learning about it across multiple grades, but… Oregon City being the final destination, that’s not something I would probably remember a year or two later, nevermind a decade or more.

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Not really, not in our school district anyways. They did allow us to play the game based on that on their ancient computers, but never really gave us historical context, nor were we required to play the game.

        I didn’t learn shit about it back then, and barely get it today. I’m 42 years old for reference.

  • Chulk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Unfortunately, I would guess that school shooter locations are probably the most easily recognised in the US. Uvalde has a population of ~15,000, for instance.

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Gibraltar has a population of 32,000, which by some definitions is too small to be considered a city.

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    What do you consider small? A lot of people know Cupertino California because Apple are based there, but it’s only got a population of 57k. It’s arguably more recognizable than the closest major city (San Jose), which has a population close to 1 million.