• “Totalitarian” and “authoritarian” do so much lifting in these arguments. People seem to think that these adjectives are only applicable to developing world countries and anywhere that isn’t the West. Try going anywhere or staying alive in this society without money, and take a look at the policies you support - are they law? Try being queer or against the social grain of society, watch what meager rights you have evaporate.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        64
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are still Black Panther survivors and AIM movement people in prison. And, like, let’s get real - Everyone in jail for drugs is a political prisoner.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Totalitarian” and “authoritarian” do so much lifting in these arguments.

      afaik they don’t mean anything. They’re purely vibes based and usually thought terminating cliches. I don’t think most of these people could name any non-authoritarian countries anywhere, or if they did they’d identify something absurd like the US or France or something. I have no idea what totalitarian is supposed to mean, I think it’s just the Great Man view of history taken to an extreme. ie Stalin and his big spoon. Like the common use of the term is either purely vibes, or just absurdly naive.

    • cynesthesia [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 year ago

      ah well you see comrade, when you analyze the data about differing political trends in the global south as well as the west, you’ll see that us-foreign-policy . I hope this distinction helps you better understand the meaning of the phrases ‘totalitarian’ and ‘authoritarian’

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 year ago

      People seem to think that these adjectives are only applicable to developing world countries and anywhere that isn’t the West.

      Alternately, anywhere their team isn’t winning.

      Texas? Authoritarian.

      Florida? Totalitarian.

      NYC? Aktuly everything is fine here.

      California? Downright utopian.

      Georgia? Divide By Zero! Does not compute!

    • privatized_sun [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Totalitarian” and “authoritarian” do so much lifting in these arguments.

      shoutout to the anti-Jewish journo Hannah Arendt who provided the ideological basis for woke radlibs to claim “(Stalinist) authoritarianism did the holocaust, we need more freedom for individual capitalists like our PMC comrade Eichmann, not less capitalism!!!”

      You can make an argument that woke neoliberal “individual freedom” ideology exists to deny the holocaust

  • pooh [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    1 year ago

    China didn’t seem very “totalitarian” when I was there, unless the definition of “totalitarian” includes friendly people and cute pandas. The police there are rarely seen (mostly in areas with large crowds), don’t even carry guns, and have a helpful and polite attitude, unlike US cops who use their position as an excuse to bully people. Also Winnie the Pooh merchandise is 100% legal there (I have photos if you don’t believe me), people can freely talk about politics and complain about the government without being taken away by secret police, and ethnic and religious minorities appear to be able to display their religion and culture freely. There IS ethnic discrimination to be clear (at least from what I’ve read and was told), which deserves to be criticized, but western countries really have no ground to stand on in this regard. They do have things like more cameras in public, but this is also not something unique to China (the UK is an example). It’s also likely that the government has access to certain commonly used apps, like WeChat, but again this isn’t really any different from western countries including the US, where the government simply buys your personal data from third parties without your knowledge. Overall, I’d say I felt the government in was China LESS threatening than the US (especially US police), but this is based on a limited window of being there for 3 weeks as a foreigner, so take it with a grain of salt.

    • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, but also, who can you really trust? Your own personal experiences? Or the US media/some white supremacist on youtube telling you how totalitarian it all is?

      Clearly, they just blasted you with the commie mind control brainwash ray while you were there so you’re now forced to say crazy things like “China is a normal country really.”

      • pooh [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It was mostly a pretty normal country. If you want to know about a truly scary thing I saw over there, though…

        spoiler

        KFC in China has a chicken taco. Like, not a taco with chicken in it, but a taco made from a huge slab fried chicken folded over. I’m vegetarian so I didn’t try it, but it looked like some of the most out of control fast food I’d ever seen.

    • PeeOnYou [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      the US gov’t definitely doesn’t buy your data, they slurp up every electronic signal they can get and store it all in their yottabyte complex in Utah they’ve been siphoning off internet traffic from fiber cables at ISPs since fiber became a thing

      • pooh [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, all of that too. The US also has 25% of the world’s prisoners despite being only 5% of the world population. That sure looks like a police state to me.

      • pooh [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wasn’t there for tourism and spent a decent amount of time with Chinese nationals. My views on this are also from speaking with people who lived there, but you are right that my own experience of it was fairly limited.

          • KarlBarqs [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            1 year ago

            All of this is stuff I learned, witnessed or experienced as a reporter working for state media.

            They weren’t surveilling the people and controlling them, they were keeping an eye on a foreign propaganda agent.

          • CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            1 year ago

            Some guys on the lemmy.ml instance try to pretend China isn’t just North Korea with positive cash flow.

            The DPRK is an amazing country, so that is a compliment.

          • MolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not going to lie, aside from the hyperbolic tone of it, most of this sounds pretty ordinary to me, with just a few points that don’t seem to match the evidence.

            All housing is designed to be a prison, locking in entire neighborhoods at the snap of a finger. See what happened in Shanghai last year. All apartment complexes and blocks of houses are behind gates and walls, with guards at each entrance. Older buildings are retrofitted to comply. These compounds are cheerfully called “communities”.

            Every apartment building I’ve ever lived in has had multiple locking entrances and exits. Gated communities with guard booths are everyhwere in the US and many other countries. Many of the places I grew up had walls or high fences around them to deter crime and reduce road noise. The street ai live in now does at either end. You also say that every building and neighbourhood is like this, but there’s tens of millions of people who live in different architectural styles and layouts. Plenty of larger towns and smaller city districts have medium density mixed use apartment buildings and low density houses, all accessible from the street. I have a professional curiosity in architecture and even aside from following various projects, reading about China’s changing architecture etc, I watch a lot of walking videos of places I haven’t been yet and while I’ve seen occasional instances of gated communities or walled courtyards between apartment blocks, most haven’t shown what you describe. Do you have any more definitive examples of what you mean?

            All housing communities have a party member who is given an office on-site. These individuals do nice things to foster community (my local lady organized an annual musical talent show) but they also know the residents and can report on them if needed.

            Like Homeowners Associations do, or the people condo boards appoint, or ‘block captains’, or building ambassadors in apartment blocks I’ve lived in, or Community Watch captains when I was growing up in England.

            All public schoolteachers are required to maintain what we call “permanent records” of children, up thru university. All behavior is recorded. Romance and dating are officially discouraged by the CPC until after college. If a teacher knows a student is dating, it will be recorded and could harm that person later in life, especially if going for government jobs or attempting to join the party.

            Students all over the world have permanent records kept by schools and increasingly the details listed are a lot more than just grades and bad behaviour. And while ‘dating’ itself might not be against the rules in all schools here in the UK (it is in some) for example, a lot public displays of affection still are. I was genuinely curious about you point about the attitude towards dating and it potentially being harmful to their reputation later, so I went looking. Most anecdotal evidence, articles, and more seem to imply that dating in China is pretty similar to anywhere else, most people start dating in high school, and certainly by college. The closest I found to the idea of it doing reputational damage was the very poor way dating multiple people at once is looked upon (although that’s true in lots of places too). I couldn’t find any reference to the fact you dated in school harming your prospects later. If you’ve got some evidence for that I’d be interested in seeing it. Likewise, I read this academic paper from 2016 on attitudes to dating in China and it makes no mention of that. It does support that since the 90s Chinese dating culture has been modernising a fair bit to become more and more like it is in a lot of the ‘West’ although some cultural trends around family remain and young people seem to have sex for the first time slightly older (around college).

            All public school classrooms thru college level have a class monitor. This student facilitates communication and represents the students to the teacher. This student also is expected to provide information about classmates. For example, Boy A is dating Girl B. Boy C didn’t study hard for his test because he went to a movie. Etc etc.

            We had / have a whole hierarchy of these in the UK too; class captains, prefects, head boy and girl etc. Some were nosy little snitches, some were chill and just student representatives. From what I hear from my many teacher friends that dynamic hasn’t changed all that much, although the positions themselves are less formalised in some schools, more so in others.

            Do you want to ride the subway? You must line up even at rush hour and have your belongings scanned. This is every subway station I ever went through, in at least six cities, including remote and rural stations.

            New York and Los Angeles have not just metal detectors, but face scanners and body scanners at some metro stations. Most modern mass transit systems use extensive facial recognition programs with their cameras. Scanning your bags is different, I’ll grant you that, but from what I’ve seen it seems pretty fast and cursory. Not nearly as intensive, lengthy, or invasive as going through an airport for example. Plenty of metro and transit systems all over the world have security or police that can and will do random bag searches and spot checks too.

            Do you want to travel to a neighboring city? You must receive official approval from the government before you can purchase train tickets. Driving? You’ll need to show your papers.

            Can you link some evidence for this? Because honestly from the Chinese people I’ve known and everything I’ve ever read this sounds like total bullshit. Chinese citizens travel freely, although there can be certain restrictions or arrangements related to specific jobs where you’re some kind of representative like certain civil service jobs and obviously there’s still hurdles around travelling in Tibet. Everything I’ve read about train travel in China states that people with a Chinese credit/debit card linked to WeChat or other apps just book tickets that way, while foreigners or older people without smartphones use ticket kiosks or offices on stations. As a foreigner you may have to show your passport as ID when buying tickets, much like checking into hotels all over the world for example, but that’s it. Basically every country on the planet requires you have papers (a licence) to show you can drive and you can be asked for it randomly, if stopped, at tolls etc. Again, not to mention traffic cameras and number plate readers.

            Do you want to move to another city and find work? You must apply for a permit and hope you’re allowed to leave. Did you lose your job in the big city? If you don’t get a new work permit soon, you’ll need to return to your hometown. Your hometown is an officially designated place that you must reside in if you have nowhere else to be. Hometowns may recall residents, or so it seems to have happened to my friend.

            Do you have any evidence for this? I’ve never heard this. Much like elsewhere in the world you’re required to keep your current residential address and other information up to date for things like legal and tax purposes. Obviously if you’re a foreigner you need visas and work permits just like in other countries, but apart from some very specific potential restrictions in certain jobs and sensitive areas, all available information states they work just like anywhere else. Likewise for student visas.

          • oregoncom [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            All apartment complexes and blocks of houses are behind gates and walls,

            As opposed to tent cities where the you people keep your underclass. Fuck off sexpat. Go bitch about being an illiterate parasite in an Asian country somewhere else. The horror, walls!

      • oregoncom [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m Chinese, dipshit. I never understood the inability of you expat parasites to have any semblance of self awareness. Just because you struggle/refuse to learn our language does not mean the opposite is true. Go back to reddit.

  • privatized_sun [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    denying genocides, and falling for totalitarian propaganda and calling such regimes “true democracies”.

    zero self awareness from the modern version of the “British writing soy utopian poems on slave cotton” PMC class

    • emizeko [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      Colonists steal native land and rename it Massachusetts. Centuries of exploitation, slavery, and war go by to establish white supremacist authority in the region. Henry David Thoreau is born. He goes to live in a shack his friend helped him build and his sister and mom helped him finance. The property is owned and controlled privately and administered by an evil slave-owning empire. His mom visits twice per week to give him pies and clean his socks. He regularly goes into town to buy food grown by exploited farm labor and probably slaves too.

      Thoreau: “Ah, untapped, unspoiled nature. Living off the land and writing fancy boy essays. I’m truly the master of my own destiny.”

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    This will accelerate sh.itjust.works down the fascist gutter. The instance is crypto-fash right now, but once you get too many of them concentrated in one place it becomes too difficult to keep them from exposing themselves and they’ll be defederated by everyone just like Exploding Heads.

    • CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      The com is on dot world, but it was down at the time so I shared the link from shit just works instead. Your point still stands though (hell, it’s probably even more applicable in this case).

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        lmao right then. Either way is good. Its existence will accelerate the rapid transition to far right for any instance it is on.

        I did warn them they were going to get nazi bar syndrome.

  • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    the funniest thing about the term “tankie” to me is that it comes from trots and stalinists arguing with each other in the COMMUNIST PARTY OF GREAT BRITAIN in the 1950s over whether khruschev was based or cringe for rolling tanks into Hungary. The Stalinists argued that Khruschev (the man who denounced Stalin) was based because he was putting down a crypto-fascist pseudo-revolution that was funded by the west, while the Trots argued that this was just Red Fash Tankie Soviet Imperialism. Someone on this site once made an effortpost about it.

    So liberals have basically appropriated a term that different communists used to fling at each other back in the 1950s, and turned it into a totally bastardized “anyone who is in favor of using violence to end capitalism, including anarchists, are LE RED FASH TANKIES.” This is especially ironic considering how much violence is used to preserve capitalism. Were the Americans not “tankies” when they rolled Abrams into Iraq? No. Clearly not. That was defending democracy from the tyranny of Saddam Hussein breaking with US interests by trying to nationalize the Iraqi oil industry building weapons of mass destruction.