Comedian and actor Russell Brand has been accused of rape, sexual assaults and emotional abuse during a seven-year period at the height of his fame.
The allegations were made in a joint investigation by the Sunday Times, the Times and Channel 4’s Dispatches.
Four women are alleging sexual assaults between 2006 and 2013.
Brand has denied the allegations and said his relationships have been “always consensual”.
During the years covered by the allegations, Brand had various high-profile jobs at different times, including at BBC Radio 2 and Channel 4, and as an actor in Hollywood films.
Other claims made as part of the investigation include allegations about Brand’s controlling, abusive and predatory behaviour.
The investigation has been published on the Sunday Times website, while the Dispatches documentary, Russell Brand - In Plain Sight, is being aired on Channel 4.
Within hours of the allegations being published online by the Sunday Times, Brand performed a scheduled comedy gig at the 2,000-capacity Troubadour Wembley Park Theatre in north-west London, as part of his current tour. Russell Brand on stage at the Troubadour Wembley Park Theatre on Saturday evening.
Several women have made allegations against Brand as part of the investigation. Channel 4’s head of news and current affairs Louisa Compton said four of the women had alleged sexual assault.
One woman alleges that Brand raped her against a wall in his Los Angeles home. She was treated at a rape crisis centre on the same day. The Times says it has seen medical records to support this
A second woman alleges that Brand assaulted her when he was in his early 30s and she was 16 and still at school. She alleges he referred to her as "the child" during an emotionally abusive and controlling relationship
A third woman claims that Brand sexually assaulted her while she worked with him in Los Angeles, and that he threatened to take legal action if she told anyone else about her allegation
The fourth woman alleged being sexually assaulted by Brand and him being physically and emotionally abusive towards her
On Friday, Russell Brand released a video in which he denied “serious criminal allegations” he said were about to be made against him.
The actor and comedian said he had received letters from a TV company and newspaper, containing “a litany” of “aggressive attacks”.
In the video, posted on YouTube and X, formerly known as Twitter, Brand said: "Amidst this litany of astonishing, rather baroque attacks are some very serious allegations that I absolutely refute.
"These allegations pertain to the time when I was working in the mainstream, when I was in the newspapers all the time, when I was in the movies, and as I’ve written about extensively in my books I was very, very promiscuous.
“Now during that time of promiscuity the relationships I had were absolutely, always consensual.”
Brand said he believed he was the subject of a “co-ordinated attack” and he was going to look into the matter because it was “very, very serious”.
While not referring to the comedian by name, the Metropolitan Police said it was “aware of media reporting of a series of allegations of sexual assault” but had not received any reports.
“If anyone believes they have been the victim of a sexual assault, no matter how long ago it happened, we would encourage them to contact police.”
The Sunday Times said all the women felt ready to speak only after being approached by reporters. The newspaper said several felt compelled to do so given Brand’s newfound prominence as an online wellness influencer.
Most of the women, who the Times said do not know each other, have chosen to remain anonymous.
The Sunday Times said it gave Brand eight days within which to reply to detailed allegations, and when given further opportunity to respond, Brand published the video on his YouTube channel.
The woman who said she was 16 when she first came into contact with Brand told the Times: “Russell engaged in the behaviours of a groomer, looking back, but I didn’t even know what that was then, or what that looked like.”
Another woman alleged to the newspaper that she repeatedly told Brand to get off her during one sexual assault, and that when he eventually relented he “flipped” and was “super angry”.
A different woman claimed that Brand pushed her up against the wall and raped her, without a condom. She alleged Brand tried to stop her leaving until she told him she was going to the bathroom.
“I ran out and I jumped in my car - thank God I didn’t park in his driveway - and booked it out of there,” she said.
Brand has hosted a number of radio and TV programmes for networks including Channel 4, MTV, Radio X and the BBC.
He started his career as a stand-up comedian in the early 2000s but got his big break a few years later as the host of Big Brother’s Big Mouth on E4.
After his profile surged, Brand was cast in Hollywood films such as Forgetting Sarah Marshall, Get Him To The Greek and Arthur.
The woman who said she was 16 at the time she met Brand told the Times she took her allegations to his literary agent Angharad Wood, the co-founder of Tavistock Wood, owned by Curtis Brown, in 2020.
Tavistock Wood told the BBC: “Russell Brand categorically and vehemently denied the allegation made in 2020, but we now believe we were horribly misled by him. Tavistock Wood has terminated all professional ties to Brand.”
A Channel 4 spokesman told the Sunday Times: "Channel 4 is appalled to learn of these deeply troubling allegations, including behaviour alleged to have taken place on programmes made for Channel 4 between 2004 and 2007.
"We are determined to understand the full nature of what went on. We have carried out extensive document searches and have found no evidence to suggest the alleged incidents were brought to the attention of Channel 4.
“We will continue to review this in light of any further information we receive, including the accounts of those affected individuals. We will be asking the production company who produced the programmes for Channel 4 to investigate these allegations and report their findings properly and satisfactorily to us.”
It said that in recent years there had been extensive change in Channel 4’s management and it was committed to ensuring the TV industry is safe and inclusive.
The relationship with the 16-year-old is alleged to have taken place at a time when Brand was working as a presenter on BBC Radio 6 Music.
It is alleged Brand would undress in the studio while working on the show. The Times also said Brand made a series of sexual remarks on air about a newsreader, which he later implied he had been told by BBC production staff to apologise for.
The Times added sources had told the newspaper that a complaint was made to BBC management about “alarming display of aggression and disrespect” from Brand.
A BBC spokesman said: "Russell Brand worked for a number of different organisations, of which the BBC was one. As is well known, Russell Brand left the BBC after a serious editorial breach in 2008 - as did the then-controller of Radio 2.
"The circumstances of the breach were reviewed in detail at the time. We hope that demonstrates that the BBC takes issues seriously and is prepared to act.
"Indeed, the BBC has, over successive years, evolved its approach to how it manages talent and how it deals with complaints or issues raised.
"We have clear expectations around conduct at work. These are set out in employment contracts, the BBC Values, the BBC code of conduct and the anti-bullying and harassment policy.
“We will always listen to people if they come forward with any concerns, on any issue related to any individual working at the BBC, past or present.”
Brand has denied the allegations and said his relationships have been “always consensual”.
Russell, you had a sexual relationship with a 16 year old.
deleted by creator
Unlike the US, the normal age of consent in most of the world is 16.
Noting I don’t think Brand cares about the age of consent or consent more broadly.
The age of consent in the US ranges from 14-17. But there’s a reason why 95% of people frown at a grown man dating a high schooler even if it’s technically “legal”.
ranges from 14
Wait wtf
In my opinion any age gap is a bit weird, but particularly so all the way up to grad school
There’s a level of independence and maturity that generally comes with having your labour stolen for 40+ hours a week
It’s 14 in Germany, Italy, Brazil and China.
In the US, the lowest it gets is 16, which is where most states have it.
In the US, the lowest it gets is 16
surprising
It gets confusing because there are states where children are able to get married before they are able to consent to sex. In 2 states, the minimum age is 15. 10 states have no minimum age. Marriage where at least one participant is under the age of 18 always requires some combination of parental consent, court consent and/or emancipation
95%
i’m pretty sure that’s not even true of the people here, let alone society at large
i’m saying this with the utmost disgust, mind
On Brand
It’s always the ones you most suspect…
Not at all surprising. He has some of the creepiest vibes of any celebrity to me.
any male celebrity
Guilty until proven innocent is the safest approach
The vampires castle by Mark Fisher continues to age like absolute trash. Can’t believe he wrote that entire thing to defend Brand back then.
That fucking text singlehandedly threw back the left decades, the amount of assholes trying to justify their shittiness with crying vampire castle is amazing.
It’s happening on other threads about this on the site even.
I had no clue that he wrote it as Brand apologia. That’s pretty fucked since Brand was never worth defending
I remember libs browbeating me back on the subreddit that this guy was a leftist. lol, lmao.
Mark Fisher (the guy that wrote capitalist realism: is there no alternative) also thought Brand was useful to the leftist movement and wrote a whole text defending him. Safe to say that text has aged like shit.
Doesn’t Fisher have some other reactionary views?
it ain’t called neo-reaction for nothing
This is incredidbly unsurprising news
This is my surprised face.
Not really out of character for Brand, particularly as he was on a shitload of drugs at the time of these allegations and was actually used as an example of the kind of man you need to be by PUA circles which should tell you a lot about how they saw a manipulator in him.
With that said I do hope this goes to court. There is no statute of limitations for rape in the UK.
One thing that I am hmmmming about is Dispatches record lately. It has been 90% propaganda, and rides on a reputation that was built when the British state media was not as right wing controlled as it is today. Their recent topics:
I do think Brand is capable of this, but the combination of complete anonymity, lack of courts and the source is going to irk a lot of people. At the moment it’s at a “my sources say” level of evidence and I’m fairly hopeful that we get more than that or this will be a complete and total shitshow that divides a lot of people and gets fed upon.
Surprising approximately nobody
I know I’m asking too much, but I’d like to see a situation where am attacker has an overwhelming amount of evidence, like multiple accusers, and the attacker says something like “I put my victims through enough. Instead of adding to their miseries, I’m going to admit my mistakes and hope to put an end to this. Although it’s certainly no justification for the terrible thing I did, those days I was going through blah blah blah. I’m very sorry to the victims for what I’ve done to them.”
Dan Harmon’s stuff wasn’t as egregious (sexual harassment of his writers rather than sexual assault of anyone), but his apology was basically this. It’s one of the few cases I’ve seen where the accuser publicly accepted the apology, too.
Jesse Lacey from Brand New did that if i remember correctly, by the time it came out he was through therapy and stuff.
If they actually felt sorry for other people, they wouldn’t have committed SA in the first place.
I totally agree with this. It’s just what I’d hope I’d do if I was in the attacker’s shoes. Dragging the case out and gaslighting the victims is just adding more shit to the victims’ problems. (obviously, I’m not clever for stating what a gazzillion other women have said before me)
@[email protected] care to explain your reasoning why this is ‘needlessly clickbait’? it’s quite literally the article headline with a content warning.
Ban the loser. I was going to, but you should have the honors
folks, don’t handwring over technicalities when it’s 16 and 30, it’s fucking weird
Ah yes, ban any dissenting voices. You make reddit look sane you realise that?
Shut up and go back to reddit you fucking creep
My mistake. I didn’t realise this was posted on hexbear. That explains everything. I my defence, it should be called “news” or “shit I made up”.
quick post a well-lit picture of your penis before you get banned
Hey before you go can you do me a favor?
Post a pic of your hog
Content warning is needlessly ott hence clickbait. As much as I’m happy for him to burn, all the accusations are against people of legal age.
16 and 30, whilst barely scraping the line of legality (depending on your location, at that), is colloquially understood to be pedophilia. I don’t see why an accusation that details lines such as:
She alleges he referred to her as “the child” during an emotionally abusive and controlling relationship
shouldn’t have a CW for pedophilia, as even if it’s not technically breaking the law, it is clear that there is an alleged power imbalance that is identical to one of a pedophilic relationship. Does that seem sound?
edit: lmao never mind, to the gulag with you
no nsfw tag :(
Good to see the past few reports on this the OPs have been quick to amend their mistakes
yeah im glad.